「600电商达人上海抖音总部持续维权，曾遭警察镇压（2025.11.23-30）」来自中国多地的约600名抖音电商商家与带货达人自2025年11月23日起，连续一周在抖音集团位于上海杨浦区五角场淞沪路的总部大楼前集体维权，抗议抖音电商平台乱罚款以及随意冻结货款，并要求平台取消错误判罚、返还被冻结或罚没的货款。

多名参与维权的商家表示，过去一年多来，平台动辄采取高额罚款和长期冻结货款来处罚商家，很多商家并没有任何违规，仍然被处罚，且申诉流程不透明，成功率低，导致大量商家蒙受经济损失，全国范围内受此影响的商家已达数万人。公开报道显示，抖音于2024年起加大了打假与侵权治理力度，至今已主动删除数百万条涉假链接、清退十六万家涉假店铺，且对侵权商家和达人进行了大规模处罚。不少商家表示，抖音的乱扣乱罚行为，相比中国的另一电商巨头拼多多有过之而无不及。2024年，电商拼多多曾因乱扣乱罚行为，引发大批电商在广东、上海等地集会抗议。

11月28日，维权的商家曾在抖音总部大楼前遭到镇压。商家拍摄的视频显示，现场有商家被警察强行带走，还有商家倒地不起。

据多名商家透露，面对维权商家的压力，抖音公司在11月28日做出了让步：取消了大量大额罚单，并缩短了部分店铺的货款冻结期；不过，达人账户和被冻结款项仍未获解冻。与此同时，多位外地商家也反馈，他们此前遭遇的判罚被部分撤销或冻结期限被缩短，证实了抖音公司已作出让步的说法。

截至11月30日，仍有大量商家在抖音上海总部维权，同时，还有不少商家在陆续赶往上海参与维权行动。

“600 E-commerce Creators Stage Week-long Protest at Douyin’s Shanghai Headquarters, Previously Met with Police Crackdowns (Nov 23–30, 2025)”

Around 600 Douyin e-commerce merchants and livestreaming creators from across China have staged a week-long protest since November 23, 2025, outside the company’s headquarters on Songhu Road in Wujiaochang, Yangpu District, Shanghai. They accuse Douyin’s e-commerce platform of arbitrary fines and unjustified freezing of their funds, demanding that the platform revoke incorrect penalties and return frozen or confiscated payments.

Many participating merchants say that over the past year, Douyin has frequently imposed hefty fines and prolonged fund freezes as punishments. Numerous merchants report being penalized despite committing no violations, while the appeal process is opaque and rarely successful. As a result, large numbers of merchants have suffered financial losses, with tens of thousands reportedly affected nationwide. Public reports indicate that since 2024, Douyin has intensified its crackdowns on counterfeit and infringing products—removing millions of suspected fake-product links, shutting down 160,000 problematic stores, and issuing widespread penalties to merchants and creators. Many merchants say Douyin’s arbitrary fines and fund freezes are even more severe than those seen on Pinduoduo, another major Chinese e-commerce platform that faced mass protests in Guangdong, Shanghai, and other regions in 2024 over similar issues.

On November 28, merchants protesting at Douyin’s Shanghai headquarters were met with a police crackdown. Videos recorded by participants show some merchants being forcibly taken away by police, while others were seen collapsing on the ground.

According to several merchants, Douyin made concessions on November 28 under mounting pressure from the demonstrators: the platform canceled numerous large fines and shortened the fund-freezing period for some stores. However, creators’ accounts and many frozen funds have not been fully restored. Merchants from other regions also reported that their previous penalties had been partially withdrawn or that their freezing periods had been shortened—corroborating claims that Douyin had begun to compromise.

As of November 30, large numbers of merchants continue to protest at Douyin’s Shanghai headquarters, while many more are reportedly traveling to Shanghai to join the demonstrations.

「贵州“反强制火葬”运动升级：镇长抢尸被擒后戴孝下跪（2025.11.28）」本周五，贵州贵阳息烽县持续了近一个月的“反强制火葬运动”再度爆发激烈冲突。包括一名镇长在内的三名政府工作人员，在试图强行抢夺遗体、并殴打逝者家属后，被愤怒的村民当场扣留。为避免挨打，三人最终戴上孝布，并在逝者棺木前下跪。

据村民透露，11月28日上午，息烽县西山镇联合村杉树坪，家属及村民在抬送一名逝者灵柩下葬途中，遭到多名政府人员和殡仪馆工作人员的拦截。政府人员要求家属交出遗体，拉到殡仪馆实施火化。然而，村民表示，死者家属持有合法土葬手续，并没有任何违规。

双方在争执中爆发肢体冲突，导致一名家属受伤。愤怒的村民随即扣留了包括镇长、支书在内的多名政府人员，并砸毁了车窗玻璃。之后，消息迅速在当地扩散，大量周边村民迅速集结，现场人数达到了数百人。

根据村民拍摄的视频，包括镇长在内的三名男子被押至棺木前，被要求以“孝子”身份下跪，并按当地习俗给他们戴上了代表孝子的白色孝布。讽刺的是，面对村民的喝斥与嘲讽，这些平日里高高在上的政府人员，非常顺从地完成了村民的要求。不过，其他政府人员却在此期间趁乱逃走。最终，在承诺不再继续封路阻拦村民后，这几名政府人员才被允许离开，但所有随行车辆均被村民扣留。

据现场网友透露，29日上午，在政府承诺将赔偿伤者医疗费用后，逝者已被下葬。现场视频显示，当天中午，被扣留的一辆红旗轿车已经被村民推下公路。

自本月初以来，贵州息烽与云南镇雄两地农民接连发起大规模“反强制火葬运动”，反对地方政府推行的强制火化政策。在此期间，两地村民和政府人员发生过多次冲突，息烽县副县长亦曾被村民围堵。在息烽县石垌镇木杉村，数千村民为防止政府人员“偷尸”，已在墓地轮流值守超过二十天，至今仍在坚守。

“Guizhou’s Anti-Forced Cremation Movement Escalates: Township Head Captured After Trying to Seize a Body, Forced to Wear Mourning Cloth and Kneel (2025.11.28)”

On Friday, in Xifeng County of Guiyang, Guizhou, the month-long anti-forced cremation movement once again erupted into violent confrontation. Three government officials — including the township head — were seized on the spot by enraged villagers after attempting to forcibly take a deceased person’s body and assaulting family members. To avoid being beaten, the three were ultimately made to wear white mourning cloths and kneel before the coffin.

According to villagers, on the morning of November 28, in Shanshuping, Lianhe Village of Xishan Town, family members and villagers were carrying a coffin to the burial site when they were blocked by several government officials and funeral-home workers. The officials demanded that the family hand over the body and transport it to the funeral home for cremation. Villagers, however, said the family possessed legal approval for a traditional burial and had violated no regulations.

A physical clash broke out during the dispute, injuring one family member. Furious, villagers detained several government personnel — including the township head and the Party branch secretary — and smashed the windows of their vehicle. The incident quickly spread through the community, and villagers from surrounding areas rapidly gathered, swelling the crowd to several hundred people.

Videos taken by villagers show three men — including the township head — being brought before the coffin. They were forced to kneel as “mourning sons,” and white mourning cloths were tied to their heads according to local customs. Ironically, despite their usual authority, the officials complied obediently amid villagers’ scolding and ridicule. Other officials, however, managed to flee during the chaos. Ultimately, the detained officials were allowed to leave only after promising not to block the villagers again. All accompanying vehicles remained in villagers’ custody.

According to locals at the scene, on the morning of the 29th, after the government promised to cover the injured person’s medical expenses, the deceased was buried. Video from that afternoon shows villagers pushing one of the seized Hongqi sedans off the roadside.

Since early this month, farmers in Xifeng, Guizhou, and Zhenxiong, Yunnan, have repeatedly launched large-scale protests against mandatory cremation policies imposed by local governments. Multiple clashes have occurred between villagers and authorities. In Xifeng, even a deputy county head was once surrounded by villagers. In Mushan Village of Shidong Town, thousands of villagers have been taking turns guarding the cemetery for over twenty days to prevent officials from “stealing bodies,” and the watch continues.

「辽宁瓦房店政府挪用“独生子女补贴” 数百农村老人集体维权（2025.11.24）」本周一（11月24日），辽宁大连瓦房店市发生60岁以上农村老人集体维权事件。数百名来自当地十余个乡镇的农村独生子女父母聚集在市政府门前，要求当地政府尽快兑现承诺，发放长期拖欠的独生子女父母补贴。

“独生子女父母补贴”是大连市自2004年起实施的一项计划生育配套政策，用于鼓励农村家庭只生育一个小孩。根据该政策，凡1933年1月1日以后出生、年满60岁的农村独生子女父母，每人可领取960元补贴。然而，这笔本就微薄的补贴自2021年起便开始被拖欠。虽然在老人们多次维权后，瓦房店政府补发了2021年的款项，但2022年至今的补贴仍未发放。有老人直言，这笔专项资金极有可能已经被地方政府挪作他用。一位参与维权的老人透露，她为此数次赴京上访，交通与时间成本早已超过补贴金额本身。

在持续不断的压力下，瓦房店市政府领导曾多次承诺补发欠款。一名市长曾表示将在2025年10月底完成发放，但承诺未能兑现。11月5日，在数百名老人再次集体维权后，相关领导又承诺将于11月15日补发部分款项，但这一承诺依旧落空。

在本周一的维权现场，老人们特地请来了一名年轻律师，希望借助法律途径与政府沟通。但面对律师和数百名老人，政府工作人员仍以各种理由推脱，未能提出任何明确的解决方案或付款时间表。最终，这场持续数小时的维权行动仍旧无果而终。这些年龄已超过六旬的老人们，只能带着新的失望再次离开。

事实上，独生子女父母补贴被长期拖欠的问题并非瓦房店市独有。据“昨天”项目统计，在中国北方地区，近年来已经出现多起因政府拖欠独生子女补贴而引发的老人维权事件。在与瓦房店市相邻的大连普兰店区和庄河市，农村老人们虽然已经发起过多次维权行动，但至今仍有长达三年的“独生子女补贴”没有拿到。

“Liaoning Wafangdian Government Diverts ‘One-Child Allowance’ Funds, Hundreds of Rural Elderly Protest (2025.11.24)”

On Monday (November 24), a collective protest involving rural elderly over the age of 60 took place in Wafangdian, a county-level city under Dalian in Liaoning Province. Hundreds of rural parents of one-child families, coming from more than a dozen local townships, gathered in front of the city government to demand that officials honor their promise and pay out the long-overdue one-child parent allowance.

The one-child parent allowance is a family-planning support policy implemented in Dalian since 2004 to encourage rural families to have only one child. Under this policy, rural parents of one-child families born after January 1, 1933, and aged 60 or above, are eligible to receive an annual subsidy of 960 yuan per person. However, even this modest allowance has been in arrears since 2021. Although, after repeated protests, the Wafangdian government eventually paid the 2021 allowance, the payments for 2022 onward remain outstanding. Some elderly residents bluntly stated that the designated funds were very likely diverted by local authorities for other uses. One protester revealed that she had traveled to Beijing multiple times to petition, and the travel costs and time spent had long exceeded the amount of the subsidy itself.

Facing mounting pressure, Wafangdian officials have repeatedly promised to repay the arrears. The mayor once said that the payments would be completed by the end of October 2025, but the pledge was never fulfilled. On November 5, after hundreds of elderly residents protested again, officials promised to issue part of the overdue funds by November 15 — yet this promise also went unfulfilled.

At Monday’s protest, the elderly residents invited a young lawyer in hopes of opening a formal legal dialogue with the government. But even in the presence of the lawyer and hundreds of elderly citizens, government staff continued to evade responsibility with various excuses, offering neither a clear plan nor any timeline for repayment. After several hours, the protest ended without any resolution. The elderly — all now well into their sixties — had no choice but to leave once again, disappointed.

In fact, long-term arrears of the one-child parent allowance are not unique to Wafangdian. According to statistics from the “Yesterday” project, similar protests by elderly residents have emerged across northern China in recent years over unpaid one-child allowances. In Dalian’s adjacent districts — Pulandian and Zhuanghe — rural elderly have already staged multiple protests, yet many have still not received up to three years’ worth of the allowance.

「生存压力下，辽宁、吉林数千辆出租车相继罢工（2025.11.21-24）」近日，中国东北地区的辽宁阜新和吉林松原接连爆发大规模出租车罢工事件。面对微薄的收入、巨大的生活压力以及“黑车”的冲击，数千名司机选择了停运抗议。

11月21日，辽宁省阜新市约3000辆出租车集体停运。据当事司机透露，罢工的直接导火索是近期大量“黑网约车”抢占了客源，而当地政府干预不力，导致本就收入微薄的司机们入不敷出。司机们曾试图集体驾车前往沈阳上访，但在途中遭到警察拦截。迫于压力，阜新市交通运输综合执法队当日即发布通告，承诺将于11月26日前清理滴滴平台中未取得网约车运输证的车辆。仅三天后，吉林省松原市的2000多辆出租车也因遭受同样的生存挤压，发起了集体罢工。

根据“昨天”项目统计，2025年以来，东北三省已先后发生十余起出租车罢工事件。如此频繁的罢工背后，除了私家车增多，网约车、共享单车等新兴业态的市场冲击外，更深层的原因在于当地低迷的经济环境与极度饱和的出租车市场。以辽宁阜新为例，该市人口仅约160万，2024年GDP仅650亿元，却拥有三千余辆出租车，相当于每533人就拥有一辆。这一人均保有量远超一般三四线城市，密度堪比北京、上海。出租车数量如此之多，一方面源于阜新市是一个资源枯竭型城市，在大量的矿企倒闭后，下岗的工人们便涌入了出租车这一入行门槛相对较低的行业以维持生计。与此同时，地方政府为追求财政收入，也曾滥发大量出租车牌照。在市场极度饱和的状态下，任何未经许可的外部运力（如“黑车”）介入，都会成为压垮司机生计的最后一根稻草，从而引发罢工。

面对行业日渐衰落，司机们为何仍不转行？原因在于，出租车牌照和车辆成本高昂，动辄数十万元，在当前的市场环境下，很难通过转手收回投入。此外，受年龄和技能限制，许多司机除了开车几乎没有其他谋生手段。尽管他们清楚这是一个“黄昏产业”，但在经济压力与就业局限的双重夹击下，只能艰难坚持，直至陷入生存困境。

Under Survival Pressure, Thousands of Taxis Strike in Liaoning and Jilin (Nov 21–24, 2025)

Recently, large-scale taxi strikes have erupted consecutively in Fuxin, Liaoning Province, and Songyuan, Jilin Province, in Northeast China. Facing meager incomes, immense living pressures, and competition from unlicensed “black taxis,” thousands of drivers chose to suspend operations in protest.

On November 21, about 3,000 taxis in Fuxin collectively stopped operating. According to drivers involved, the immediate trigger was the surge of unlicensed ride-hailing vehicles that captured passengers, while local authorities failed to intervene effectively, leaving already low-earning drivers unable to make ends meet. Drivers attempted to drive collectively to Shenyang to petition higher authorities but were intercepted along the way. Under pressure, the Fuxin Municipal Comprehensive Transportation Law Enforcement Team issued a notice that same day, pledging to remove vehicles on the Didi platform without ride-hailing licenses by November 26. Just three days later, over 2,000 taxis in Songyuan, Jilin Province, also launched a strike due to similar survival pressures.

According to statistics from the “Yesterday” project, more than ten taxi strikes have occurred across the three northeastern provinces since the beginning of 2025. Behind this frequent unrest, beyond the rise of private cars and market disruptions from ride-hailing and bike-sharing platforms, deeper causes lie in the local sluggish economic environment and the oversaturated taxi market. In Fuxin, Liaoning, for instance, the city has a population of about 1.6 million and a GDP of just 65 billion yuan in 2024, yet it hosts over 3,000 taxis—equivalent to one taxi per 533 residents. This per-capita taxi density far exceeds that of typical third- or fourth-tier cities and is comparable to Beijing or Shanghai.

The large number of taxis stems partly from Fuxin being a resource-exhausted city. After many mining companies closed, laid-off workers flocked to the taxi industry, which has a relatively low entry threshold, to make a living. At the same time, local authorities, seeking fiscal revenue, had previously issued excessive taxi licenses. In an already oversaturated market, any external unlicensed transport—such as “black taxis”—can become the final straw that crushes drivers’ livelihoods, triggering strikes.

Why do drivers not change careers despite the industry’s decline? The reason lies in the high cost of taxi licenses and vehicles, often tens of thousands of yuan, which is difficult to recover in the current market. Moreover, due to age and skill limitations, many drivers have few alternative means of livelihood beyond driving. Although they are aware this is a “sunset industry,” under the combined pressures of economic hardship and limited employment options, they can only persist with great difficulty, ultimately falling into a survival crisis.

「云贵高原反强制火葬运动以及当下集体抗争态势（2025.11.25）」在中国西南的云贵高原，由农民自发组织的“反强制火葬运动”已持续近一个月，并呈现除进一步扩散的趋势。11月25日，云南昭通镇雄县与贵州贵阳息烽县分别出现数以千计的村民聚集事件，公开抗议地方当局推进的强制火化政策。

在云南昭通镇雄县中屯镇青山村，继本月初发生上千村民强行突破政府人员阻拦，护送逝者土葬的事件后。本周二，上千村民再次集结，为另一名逝去的老人举行土葬仪式。与月初不同的是，此次当地政府甚至未敢派出人员阻拦。村民们一路高喊“坚决不火葬”口号，顺利完成了仪式。

在贵州贵阳息烽县石垌镇木杉村，村民为防止政府进村“抢尸”强制火化，自14天前便开始集体驻守在墓地周围。随着事件在网络扩散，村民们的行动引发了强烈关注，不仅石垌镇18个村均有村民到场抗议，邻近乡镇，甚至附近县市的民众也陆续赶到现场声援。周二当天，现场人数一度达到约2000人。直至当晚，仍有上千人在现场坚守，形成了近年来罕见的能持续十余日的大规模集体抗争行动。而就在几天前，离木杉村仅数公里的石垌镇水头村村民，甚至还包围了要求交出死者遗体的息烽县副县长强勇，并最终逼退官方人员。

近年来，仍能形成一定规模的群体性事件，主要集中在中小城市和广大农村地区。蒲城、宁陵、江油等大规模抗争发生于县城或县级市；而杨大召、张宝山、安龙、琼中等事件，以及此次云贵高原的反强制火葬运动，则集中在农村。这种空间分布与“白纸运动”之后的社会环境密切相关。在大城市，中共依托大数据监控体系、强化社会管控，并持续加大维稳投入，使得大规模集体行动几乎绝迹；但在地域广阔、人口分散的农村地区，当局难以投入同等强度的维稳资源与监控密度，因而成了群体抗争事件高发区。同时，相较于深度嵌入体制或依赖城市体系生活的市民阶层，农民受制度约束相对较弱，在核心利益受到侵害时，抗争意志往往更为坚决。加之农村地区仍保留一定的宗族结构，社区内部的组织力和动员力相对更强。另外，随着智能手机、私家车等的普及，农村社会的互联性显著提升，加速了事件的跨区域扩散，这一点在近些年的大规模群体抗争事件中表现明显。

随着经济的持续下行，大量农民将不得不返回农村，他们不仅带回了失业的焦虑和生存的压力，也带回了更广阔的视野和维权意识。预计在未来几年，农村地区以及小型城市的集体抗争事件将会持续高发。中共最近提出的“防止规模性返乡”口号，恰恰反映了他们对这一风险的焦虑。

“Anti–Forced Cremation Movement on the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau and the Current Landscape of Collective Resistance (Nov. 25, 2025)”

On the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau in southwest China, a farmer-led “anti–forced cremation movement” has been ongoing for nearly a month, and is showing signs of further escalation. On November 25, thousands of villagers gathered separately in Zhenxiong County of Zhaotong, Yunnan, and Xifeng County of Guiyang, Guizhou, to openly protest local authorities’ push for mandatory cremation policies.

In Qingshan Village of Zhongtun Town, Zhenxiong County, Yunnan, more than a thousand villagers clashed with authorities earlier this month as they forced their way through official blockades to bury a deceased villager according to traditional customs. On Tuesday, over a thousand villagers assembled again to hold another burial ceremony for an elderly resident. Unlike the incident earlier this month, local officials did not even attempt to intervene. Villagers marched while chanting “We firmly oppose cremation” and completed the ceremony without obstruction.

In Mushan Village of Shidong Town, Xifeng County, Guizhou, villagers have been guarding the cemetery around the clock for 14 consecutive days to prevent the government from entering the village to “seize bodies” for forced cremation. As videos of the standoff circulated online, the action drew widespread attention. Villagers from all 18 villages in Shidong Town, as well as residents from nearby towns and even neighboring counties and cities, flocked to the site in support. On Tuesday, the crowd at one point reached roughly 2,000 people. By that evening, over a thousand villagers were still holding their ground—making it one of the rare large-scale collective actions in recent years capable of sustaining itself for more than ten days. Just days earlier, in Shuitou Village only a few kilometers away, villagers even surrounded Xifeng County’s deputy magistrate, Qiang Yong, demanding that he return a deceased villager’s body, ultimately forcing officials to retreat.

In recent years, the limited number of collective actions that still manage to reach significant scale have been concentrated mainly in small and medium-sized cities as well as rural areas. Large protests in Pucheng, Ningling, and Jiangyou occurred in county seats or county-level cities; while incidents such as Yang Dazhao, Zhang Baoshan, Anlong, Qiongzhong—and now the anti-cremation movement on the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau—have all erupted in rural regions. This spatial distribution is closely related to the social environment shaped after the “White Paper Movement.” In major cities, the CCP increasingly relies on extensive data-driven surveillance systems, strengthened social control, and expanding stability-maintenance budgets, making large-scale collective actions almost impossible. In contrast, rural areas—with vast territories and dispersed populations—are far more difficult for the state to monitor and police with equal intensity, thus becoming hotspots for collective resistance. Moreover, compared to urban residents who are deeply embedded in institutional structures, farmers face fewer systemic constraints and often show stronger resolve when core interests are infringed upon. Rural communities also retain certain clan-based networks, giving them stronger internal organization and mobilization capacity. Additionally, with the spread of smartphones and private vehicles, rural society has become far more interconnected, accelerating cross-regional information flow—something increasingly visible in major collective actions in recent years.

As China’s economic downturn continues, large numbers of migrant workers are expected to return to their home villages. They will bring back not only unemployment pressures and livelihood anxieties, but also broader perspectives and heightened rights-awareness. As a result, collective protests in rural regions and smaller cities are expected to remain frequent in the coming years. The CCP’s recent slogan calling to “prevent large-scale return migration” is itself a reflection of the authorities’ growing anxiety over this risk.

「“白纸运动”三周年上海当局草木皆兵，男子外滩举旗被逮（2025.11.24）」11月24日，“白纸运动”三周年前夕，上海外滩再度出现令人啼笑皆非的场景。一名计划骑摩托车环游中国的男子，当天抵达上海后，前往外滩和平饭店门前打卡留念。然而，在他从背包中掏出一面随身携带的旗帜准备拍照时，两名便衣警察突然上前，以迅雷不及掩耳的速度将旗帜夺走，男子甚至来不及将旗帜举起。随后经确认，该旗帜上并无任何所谓的“反动”内容。尽管如此，该男子仍被要求配合警察完成调查后才得以脱身。

这种因警察过度紧张而导致的误会在外滩并非首次。今年早些时候的8月22日，一名在外滩卖老冰棍的小贩，竟被当成“炸弹客”抓走。有网友表示，现在的外滩，你根本不知道哪些人才是真正的游客。

三年前的11月下旬，中国多座城市爆发了“白纸运动”，上海是核心地点之一。

“Shanghai on High Alert Ahead of White Paper Movement Anniversary; Man Detained for Raising Flag on the Bund (2025.11.24)”

On November 24, on the eve of the third anniversary of the “White Paper Movement,” an absurd scene once again unfolded on Shanghai’s Bund. A man who planned to travel around China by motorcycle arrived in Shanghai that day and went to the Peace Hotel on the Bund to take a photo. However, just as he pulled a flag from his backpack to take a picture, two plainclothes officers suddenly rushed forward and snatched it at lightning speed — he didn’t even have time to raise it. It was later confirmed that the flag contained no so-called “subversive” content. Nevertheless, the man was still required to cooperate with police for questioning before being allowed to leave.

Such misunderstandings caused by overly nervous police are not new on the Bund. Earlier this year, on August 22, a street vendor selling old-style ice pops on the Bund was even mistaken for a “bomber” and taken away. Some netizens commented that on today’s Bund, you simply don’t know who the real tourists are.

In late November three years ago, the “White Paper Movement” broke out across many Chinese cities, and Shanghai was one of the core locations.

「黑龙江公立医院爆发罢工 医护人员抗议长期拖欠工资社保（2025.11.20）」11月20日，黑龙江省绥化市人民医院爆发医护人员集体罢工事件。由于医院连续五个月未发放工资，并长期欠缴医保和社保，包括医生、护士、以及行政人员在内的全院多科室职工集体走上街头，在医院门前拉起横幅，要求院方“还我血汗钱”。

现场视频显示，多名医护人员手持醒目的红底白字横幅，上面写有：“绥化市人民医院拖欠职工工资社保等，还我血汗钱”。一名职工代表在现场发言时表示，此次抗议是因医院多年来未按规定为员工缴纳医保和社保，且工资已连续五个月未发放。她们想知道，这些年医院一直盈利，医护人员的钱去哪里了。在警察试图驱散现场的维权职工时，有职工代表情绪激动地向警察喊话：“警察你们没有权力管”，并要求警察给条活路。

此次集体抗议并非孤立事件，而是该院多年来劳资矛盾的集中爆发。早在2020年3月新冠疫情期间，就有该院员工通过社交媒体发声，反映一线抗疫人员被拖欠三四个月工资，并质问：“让这些坚守一线的工作人员怎么活？”

矛盾在2023年7月进一步公开化。当时，一名职工通过录制视频实名举报该院院长长期克扣和拖欠职工工资，并指控其对员工进行威胁和辱骂。该职工提到，在过去13年间，医院从未按满12个月发放工资，且经常少发数月，去向不明。此外，2022年国家为事业单位补发的19个月基础加绩效工资，职工仅拿到一半。面对职工反映经济困难，院长竟扬言“钱在他那，他想欠就欠”。举报人还爆料称，一线人员拿不到工资，而“知道院长秘密的财会室人员每月领四份工资”。

绥化市人民医院为二级甲等公立医院。值得注意的是，除了严重的劳资纠纷，该院在管理和财务上也屡遭质疑。就在此次罢工前不到两个月，即2025年9月30日，绥化市医疗保障局因该院存在过度诊疗、重复收费等违规行为，对其处以91.15万余元的罚款。

通常，欠薪问题多见于建筑业和制造业，但如今已蔓延至医疗系统，连公立医院也无法幸免。今年以来，“昨天”频道已记录到多起医护人员因长期被拖欠工资而维权的事件，其中包括山东临沂河东医院、河北邢台市信都区中心医院以及绥化市人民医院三家公立医疗机构。从这些事件在网络上的反映来看，医院欠薪在中国已十分普遍。不过，由于中共的严密审查与删帖，再加医护人员在压力之下往往选择沉默，这些被曝光出来的案例只是冰山一角。

Public Hospital Strike in Heilongjiang: Medical Staff Protest Long-Term Wage and Social Security Arrears (2025.11.20)

On November 20, medical staff at Suihua People’s Hospital in Heilongjiang Province launched a collective strike. With the hospital failing to pay wages for five consecutive months and long overdue contributions to medical insurance and social security, staff across multiple departments—including doctors, nurses, and administrative personnel—took to the streets. They unfurled banners at the hospital entrance demanding the hospital “return our hard-earned money.”

Footage from the scene shows multiple medical staff holding bright red banners with white lettering reading: “Suihua People’s Hospital owes employees wages and social security—return our hard-earned money.” A staff representative at the scene stated that the protest arose because the hospital had for many years failed to pay social security and medical insurance according to regulations, and wages had been unpaid for five consecutive months. They want to know, given the hospital has been profitable all these years, where the staff’s money has gone. When police tried to disperse the protesting staff, a representative shouted emotionally at the officers: “Police, you have no authority here!” and demanded they leave the staff alone.

This collective protest is not an isolated incident, but the culmination of long-standing labor disputes at the hospital. As early as March 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, staff used social media to report that frontline workers were owed three to four months’ wages and asked: “How are those standing on the frontlines supposed to survive?”

The dispute became further public in July 2023, when a staff member recorded a video publicly accusing the hospital director of long-term wage withholding and threatening and insulting employees. The staff member reported that over the past 13 years, the hospital never paid full 12-month wages, frequently withheld several months’ pay with no explanation, and in 2022, only half of the 19 months of base plus performance wages issued by the state to public institutions reached staff. When employees reported financial difficulties, the director reportedly said, “The money is with me; I will pay or withhold as I wish.” The whistleblower also claimed that frontline staff received no wages, while finance staff aware of the director’s “secret accounts” received four salaries each month.

Suihua People’s Hospital is a Grade II Class A public hospital. In addition to serious labor disputes, the hospital’s management and finances have repeatedly been questioned. Less than two months before the strike, on September 30, 2025, the Suihua Medical Security Bureau fined the hospital over 911,500 yuan for violations including excessive treatment and duplicate charges.

Wage arrears are usually seen in construction and manufacturing, but now have spread to the healthcare system, even affecting public hospitals. This year, the “Yesterday” channel has reported multiple incidents of medical staff protesting long-term wage arrears, including at Linyi Hedong Hospital in Shandong, Xindu District Central Hospital in Hebei, and Suihua People’s Hospital. From these online reports, wage arrears in hospitals appear widespread in China. However, due to the Chinese Communist Party’s strict censorship and post deletions, and the fact that many medical staff remain silent under pressure, the cases that have been exposed are likely just the tip of the iceberg.

「贵州农民围县长反强制火葬：怒斥官员“先挖习近平祖坟”（2025.11.22）」本周六（11月22日），贵州省贵阳市息烽县石硐镇连续爆发两起农民示威事件，村民们为抵制当地政府推行的强制火葬政策，与政府人员发生了激烈对峙，并一度围堵了一名副县长。

强征火葬政策不得人心，村民怒斥官员“先挖习近平祖坟”

事件的起因是息烽县近期开始实施的强制火葬政策，该政策要求辖区内所有居民，死后必须进行火化。这一政策一经推出，便引发民间普遍不满。村民指出，周边许多市县因政策遭反对，已从“强制火葬”改为“自愿火葬”，但息烽县却坚持强推，且无法拿出法律依据。村民表示，当地政府为了敛财，强制推行火葬，不但违背了“入土为安”的传统习俗，还将增加农户负担。不少村民在支付火化费、购买骨灰盒后，还要按照传统购置棺木为逝者进行土葬，因为农村没有专门的地方存放骨灰盒。

在面对进村宣传政策并要求村民签字的政府人员，村民曾愤怒质问：“如果共产党要挖祖坟，就先把习近平家的祖坟挖了再说！你们敢去挖吗？”此外，村民还警告政府人员，政府若想要强行挖走已下葬的遗体，“你们就放马过来，看看老百姓会不会放过你们”

木杉村：数百村民聚集阻政府偷尸

周六白天，在石硐镇木杉村，数百村民在听闻政府人员将挖走一名以下葬死者的遗体后，迅速聚集。在现场，村民们手持棍棒守在坟头四周，表示若政府人员强挖遗体，他们将“拼死阻拦”。此外，村民们还在现场用音响持续播放诉求，要求取消强制火葬政策；直至当天深夜，大批村民仍在坟山周围值守，而此前曾扬言要进村抢尸的政府人员，则因人数劣势，未有行动。

水头村：副县长殴打死者家属被围

周六晚，在距离木杉村仅数公里的水头村，一场更为激烈的对峙爆发。据当地村民称，息烽县副县长强勇在要求家属交出一名死者遗体时，殴打了死者的妹妹，引发众怒。

愤怒的村民迅速聚集，人数从几十人扩大到数百人，将副县长与随行的多名政府人员及警察层层围堵，期间，双方再次爆发冲突。现场视频显示，副县长强勇曾承诺会承担伤者的全部医药费用。双方的对峙一直持续到次日凌晨，在此期间，副县长强勇趁乱逃离了现场。

目前，两起事件仍在当地不断发酵，有大量周边网友表示将会到现场支持村民的反抗行动。

“Guizhou Farmers Surround County Official in Protest Against Mandatory Cremation: Villagers Lash Out, Saying ‘Dig Up Xi Jinping’s Ancestral Tomb First’ (Nov. 22, 2025)”

On Saturday (November 22), two separate protests broke out in Shidong Town, Xifeng County, Guiyang, Guizhou Province. Villagers resisting the local government’s mandatory cremation policy confronted officials, and at one point surrounded a deputy county chief.

Mandatory cremation policy provokes widespread discontent; villagers tell officials to “dig up Xi Jinping’s ancestral tomb first”

The protests stemmed from Xifeng County’s recent implementation of a mandatory cremation policy requiring all residents to be cremated after death. The policy has triggered broad public dissatisfaction. Villagers noted that many neighboring cities and counties, due to public opposition, had already shifted from mandatory to voluntary cremation, yet Xifeng County continued to push ahead and failed to provide any legal grounds for the requirement.

They argued that the local government was enforcing cremation for financial gain, in a way that not only contradicts the traditional custom of burial for “resting in the earth,” but also increases the financial burden on rural households. Many villagers said that after paying for cremation and purchasing urns, they still had to buy coffins for burial because rural areas have no designated facilities to store urns.

When government staff entered the villages to promote the policy and solicit signatures, villagers angrily confronted them, saying:
“If the Communist Party wants to dig up ancestors’ graves, then start by digging up Xi Jinping’s ancestral tomb! Do you dare?”
They also warned that if authorities attempted to forcibly exhume bodies already buried,
“Go ahead and try—let’s see whether ordinary people will let you walk away.”

Mushan Village: Hundreds gather to stop officials from exhuming a body

During the day on Saturday in Mushan Village, hundreds of villagers gathered after hearing that government personnel intended to remove the body of a recently buried resident. Villagers stood guard around the gravesite holding wooden sticks, saying they would “resist to the death” if the authorities attempted a forced exhumation.
Loudspeakers were used on site to broadcast their demands for the mandatory cremation policy to be withdrawn. Villagers continued guarding the area late into the night. Officials—who earlier had threatened to “seize the body”—did not act because they were outnumbered.

Shuitou Village: Deputy county chief allegedly assaults deceased’s sister and is surrounded

On Saturday night, a more intense confrontation occurred in Shuitou Village, only a few kilometers away. According to villagers, Xifeng County Deputy Chief Qiang Yong struck the sister of a deceased resident while demanding that the family hand over the body, which sparked anger.

Villagers quickly gathered—growing from dozens to hundreds—surrounding the deputy county chief along with accompanying officials and police. A physical clash followed.
Video from the scene shows Qiang Yong promising to cover all medical expenses for the injured woman. The standoff lasted until the early hours of the next morning, during which Qiang eventually escaped amid the commotion.

Both incidents continue to escalate, and many netizens from nearby areas have expressed intentions to travel to the scene to support the villagers.

「广东医院拒绝救治危重病人，家属讨说法反遭殴打（2025.11.21）」近日，广东揭阳普宁市发生一起医院拒绝救治危重病人事件。一名26岁女子因胃痛前往普宁市人民医院就诊，在入院不到48小时内便不幸离世。令家属愤怒的是，在医院下达病危通知书后的长达近4小时的黄金抢救期内，面对患者的痛苦挣扎和多次求救，竟无一名医生到场施救，最终导致悲剧发生。

危急时刻四小时无人施救

据家属回忆，患者于2025年11月13日早上因持续胃痛前往普宁市人民医院就诊，被检查出血小板数量极低，随即被要求住院。然而，经过一日治疗，患者病情非但未见好转，血小板计数反而进一步下跌。

悲剧的转折点发生在11月14日深夜。约23时50分，医院正式下达了病危通知书。家属透露，从接到通知后的近4个小时内，患者病情急转直下，开始出现严重的心脏剧痛。在这段生死攸关的时间里，家属至少五次奔赴护士站急切求助，哭诉病人情况危急。然而，在患者痛苦挣扎的近四小时内，始终没有一位医生前来查看或采取急救措施，只有一名护士进行过一次不足一分钟的短暂巡视。15日凌晨3点49分，在家属发现女子心脏已停止跳动并绝望的持续呼救19分钟后，才终于有一名医生赶到现场进行心肺复苏，但为时已晚，回天乏术。对此，家属悲愤地表示：“26岁，她的人生才刚刚开始。从胃痛到心脏剧痛，她在一个满是“白衣天使”的地方，孤独地对抗死亡。”

讨说法遭暴力对待

11月21日，事件发生六天后，由于医院方面始终未给出明确答复或合理解释，家属便前往医院讨要公道，并在医院门口撒满了纸钱。然而，普宁市人民医院不仅拒绝回应家属诉求，反而出动保安及打手暴力驱逐维权家属。据家属透露，除保安外，还有多名身份不明的人在现场对家属进行殴打。

事后，家属想通过网络求助，但他们发现，他们在现场拍摄的视频，大多无法发出。少量发布成功的视频，也会被限流或删除。对此，许多有亲身经历的网友纷纷留言，指责普宁市人民医院“的确很不靠谱”、“毫无医德”。有网友感叹：“有权有势就是这样一手遮天，普通百姓都没有发言权。”

“Guangdong Hospital Refuses to Treat Critical Patient; Family Beaten While Seeking Answers (2025.11.21)”

Recently, in Puning City of Jieyang, Guangdong Province, a hospital was accused of refusing to treat a critically ill patient. A 26-year-old woman sought medical help for stomach pain at Puning People’s Hospital and tragically passed away less than 48 hours after admission. What enraged the family was that during the nearly four-hour “golden rescue window” after the hospital issued a critical-condition notice, not a single doctor came to provide emergency care despite the patient’s severe distress and repeated pleas for help—ultimately leading to her death.

Four Hours Without Medical Intervention at a Critical Moment

According to the family, the patient went to Puning People’s Hospital on the morning of November 13, 2025, due to persistent stomach pain. Tests showed extremely low platelet levels, and she was immediately admitted. However, after a full day of treatment, her condition did not improve; instead, her platelet count dropped even further.

The turning point came late at night on November 14. At around 11:50 p.m., the hospital officially issued a critical-condition notice. The family reported that during the nearly four hours after receiving this notice, the patient’s condition sharply deteriorated, and she began experiencing severe chest pain. During this life-or-death period, the family rushed to the nurses’ station for help at least five times, pleading that the patient was in critical condition. Yet throughout these almost four agonizing hours, no doctor ever came to evaluate the patient or administer emergency treatment. Only one nurse briefly checked in for less than a minute.

At 3:49 a.m. on November 15, after the family discovered that the woman’s heart had stopped and had been desperately shouting for help for 19 minutes, a doctor finally arrived to perform CPR—but it was too late. She could not be revived. Heartbroken and furious, the family said, “She was only 26—her life had just begun. From stomach pain to intense chest pain, she fought death alone in a place full of so-called ‘angels in white.’”

Family Beaten While Seeking Accountability

On November 21, six days after the incident, the family returned to the hospital seeking an explanation, as the hospital had still offered no clear response. They scattered funeral paper money at the hospital entrance in protest. Instead of addressing their concerns, Puning People’s Hospital dispatched security guards—and even hired thugs—to violently remove the family members. According to the family, several unidentified individuals also joined in the assault.

Afterward, the family tried to seek help online, only to find that many of the videos they recorded at the scene could not be uploaded. The few videos that were successfully posted were quickly suppressed or removed. Many netizens who claimed to have personal experience with the hospital commented, criticizing Puning People’s Hospital as “truly unreliable” and “utterly lacking in medical ethics.” One commenter lamented: “This is what happens when those in power can cover the sky with one hand. Ordinary people have no voice at all.”