「大连女孩徐园离奇身亡案再次开庭，数百网民庭外声援（2025.10.24）」10月24日下午，备受争议的“徐园案”在辽宁大连普兰店区人民法院再次开庭。数百名从中国各地赶到现场的网友聚集在法院外，声援受害者一家。当局出动大批警察和特警在现场戒备，庭外气氛紧张，人群高喊“杀人偿命”等口号。期间，网友与维稳警察一度发生冲突，至少一名网友被抓走。在法庭内，法官再次宣布徐园前男友、嫌疑人单某无罪。徐园的姐姐表示，本次庭审仅持续约两分钟，法官便直接宣布了判决结果。
案件的起点可追溯至2022年4月26日凌晨。23岁的徐园被发现死于男友单某家中，胸口插着一把水果刀，肋骨骨折，全身几十处伤。法医鉴定她死于“锐器刺切胸部致心脏、肺脏破裂”。然而，法院最终将案件定性为“自杀”，嫌疑人单某无罪释放。这一结论自公布以来便引起家属和公众的强烈质疑。
据悉，2022年2月12日，徐园经人介绍认识单某，两人不久确立恋爱关系，并在两个月后同居。一审判决认定，2022年4月25日晚，单某、徐园和几位朋友先后在当地的烧烤店和歌厅吃饭喝酒。次日凌晨，单某和徐园回到家中后发生争执，从屋内延续到楼外，单某对徐园进行了言语侮辱和殴打。随后，两人再次返回家中，徐园出事。
据单某供述，当晚，徐园先去洗澡，因徐园不同意他提出煮方便面的要求，两人发生言语冲突，单某摔门而出，徐园围了一条浴巾追了出去。两人在离家十余米的楼前发生了撕扯，单某用手打了徐园几下，后将其整个人拽倒在地。随后，单某劝说徐园先回两人的住所，两人一前一后回到了家。单某称，徐园进门后，找了一件白色衣服穿上，走到厨房水池边拿起一把水果刀，拔下刀鞘，转身说了一句“我徐园怎么对不起你了”，紧接着突然撩起衣服，将刀插进了自己的左胸口。但事发当晚，仅有单某和徐园两个人，无第三人证实究竟发生了什么。
经大连市普兰店区公安司法鉴定中心鉴定，徐园系锐器刺切胸部致左侧肺脏、心脏破裂大出血死亡，但上衣并无破口；徐园双眼、鼻部、左耳等及下唇粘膜破损出血等符合钝性外力作用形成，徒手击打可形成；额部、左上臂、双下肢等符合受外力作用形成，双手掌侧血迹分布呈空心状，右手指关节有划伤。这份报告中存在两个引发争议的细节：一，衣服无破口： 徐园胸口的致命刀伤深达心脏，但她所穿的上衣却没有破口。二，身体多处外伤： 尸检还显示，徐园的头部、面部、四肢均有不同程度的外伤，与“争执后被殴打”的情节吻合。
这两点让家属坚信徐园不是自杀，而是他杀。据悉，单某曾有斗殴、故意伤害等暴力前科。2014年，单某因为故意伤害罪被判一年，缓刑两年，在缓刑期间，单某又因为犯聚众斗殴罪被撤销缓刑，判四年零两个月刑期。2021年，单某再次因为殴打他人被刑拘十五日，罚款五百元。
案发前几天，两人争吵频繁。4月20日晚，徐园在单某父母经营的殡葬店找到醉酒的单某，被对方殴打。单父在证词中也提到，当晚徐园曾打电话称自己被打，后来他赶到现场调解，二人又和好。4月23日晚9点左右，二人再次发生争吵，单某对徐园说“你去死吧”。
尽管存在多处疑点，2023年9月，普兰店区法院一审判决认为徐园系因情绪激动自行持刀刺胸自杀，单某虽有轻微殴打行为，但证据不足以证明与死亡存在直接因果关系，遂判无罪释放。之后，检方提起抗诉，但历经数次庭审，法院仍维持原判。
近三年来，徐园的家人从未接受“自杀”这一结论，坚持认为：徐园并无明显自杀倾向；衣服无破口、刀具血迹异常、现场勘查疏漏、调查过程缺乏透明性等一系列问题均指向他杀。徐母在采访中坚定表示：“我女儿绝不会自己拿刀刺心脏，她才23岁，有工作、有朋友、有计划。”
10月24日的庭审结束后，许多专程赶到现场声援的网友对庭审的结果表示极度失望和愤怒，认为法庭判决结果是对公平正义、以及受害者家属的严重伤害。徐园的家属则表示将继续抗争，永不放弃。
“Case of Dalian Girl Xu Yuan’s Mysterious Death Reopens; Hundreds Gather Outside Court in Support (Oct 24, 2025)”
On the afternoon of October 24, the highly controversial “Xu Yuan case” was once again heard at the People’s Court of Pulandian District, Dalian, Liaoning Province. Hundreds of netizens from across China gathered outside the courthouse to support the victim’s family. A large number of police officers and SWAT forces were deployed to maintain order, and the atmosphere outside the court was tense. The crowd chanted slogans such as “A murderer must pay with his life.” During the confrontation, clashes broke out between supporters and police, and at least one person was detained. Inside the courtroom, the judge once again declared Xu Yuan’s ex-boyfriend, the suspect Shan Mou, not guilty. Xu Yuan’s sister said the hearing lasted only about two minutes before the judge directly announced the verdict.
The case dates back to the early morning of April 26, 2022. Xu Yuan, a 23-year-old woman, was found dead in the home of her boyfriend, Shan Mou, with a fruit knife lodged in her chest, fractured ribs, and dozens of bruises across her body. A forensic autopsy determined that she died from “stab and cut injuries to the chest causing rupture of the heart and lungs.” However, the court later ruled her death a suicide, and Shan was acquitted—an outcome that immediately triggered outrage and disbelief among Xu’s family and the public.
According to records, Xu Yuan met Shan through an introduction on February 12, 2022. They soon began dating and moved in together two months later. The first trial found that on the night of April 25, Shan, Xu, and several friends had dinner and drinks at a local barbecue restaurant and karaoke bar. In the early hours of the next day, after returning home, the couple argued—first inside, then outside the building—during which Shan verbally insulted and assaulted Xu. They then went back home, where the fatal incident occurred.
Shan claimed that Xu went to shower, and when she refused his request to cook instant noodles, an argument broke out. He slammed the door and left the apartment, with Xu following him outside wearing only a towel. They scuffled about ten meters from the building entrance; Shan admitted to hitting Xu several times and pulling her to the ground. Later, he persuaded her to return home, and the two went back together. Shan said Xu put on a white shirt, walked to the kitchen sink, picked up a fruit knife, removed its sheath, said “What have I, Xu Yuan, ever done to you?” and suddenly lifted her shirt and stabbed herself in the chest. No third person was present that night to verify what really happened.
A forensic report from the Pulandian District Public Security Bureau determined that Xu died from massive bleeding due to stab wounds that pierced her left lung and heart. However, her clothing showed no tear marks. The report also noted blunt-force injuries to her eyes, nose, left ear, and lips consistent with assault, and additional bruises on her forehead, arms, and legs. Bloodstains on her palms were hollow-patterned, and her right fingers were cut. Two details have been particularly controversial:
- No tear in clothing – despite a fatal knife wound penetrating her heart.
- Multiple external injuries –
These findings led her family to firmly believe that Xu Yuan was murdered, not suicidal.
Records show that Shan had a history of violent offenses. In 2014, he was convicted of intentional injury and sentenced to one year in prison with a two-year suspension. During probation, he was convicted again for group assault and sentenced to four years and two months. In 2021, he was detained for 15 days and fined 500 yuan for assaulting another person.
In the days leading up to Xu’s death, the couple frequently quarreled. On April 20, Xu reportedly went to Shan’s family’s funeral shop to find him drunk and was beaten by him. Shan’s father testified that Xu called saying she had been hit; he went to mediate, and the two later reconciled. On the night of April 23, Shan told Xu, “Go die.”
Despite numerous inconsistencies, in September 2023 the Pulandian District Court ruled that Xu Yuan had stabbed herself in the chest during an emotional outburst. Although Shan admitted to minor assault, the court held there was insufficient evidence to link his actions directly to her death, and he was acquitted. Prosecutors appealed, but after multiple hearings, the court upheld the original verdict.
For nearly three years, Xu Yuan’s family has refused to accept the “suicide” conclusion. They insist that Xu had no suicidal tendencies and point to multiple irregularities—such as the intact clothing, questionable blood patterns, omissions in the crime scene investigation, and lack of transparency in the judicial process—as evidence of foul play. Xu’s mother said firmly in an interview: “My daughter would never stab herself in the heart. She was only 23, she had a job, friends, and plans for her future.”
After the October 24 hearing, many supporters who had traveled long distances expressed deep anger and disappointment at the verdict, calling it a betrayal of justice and the victim’s family. Xu Yuan’s relatives vowed to continue their fight for justice and “never give up.”
