「宁波“小洛熙”微创手术后不幸离世，母亲维权获大批网民声援（2025.11.17)」11月17日晚，浙江宁波市海曙区天一广场，一天前痛失爱女的邓女士，在亲属的陪同下向赶来声援的市民讲述女儿小洛熙的离世经过，并实名控诉宁波市妇女儿童医院心脏科主任陈某某。过去两天中，邓女士的遭遇迅速在社交网络上发酵，相关话题阅读量累计已达数千万次。在天一广场，邓女士也得到了大量当地市民的支持，许多市民是在网络上得到消息后，专程赶到天一广场支持他们。不过，邓女士一家的维权行动却遭到了警察的阻拦。
低风险微创手术失败，5个月女婴不幸离世
据邓女士自述，2025年5月26日出生的女儿小洛熙虽然是早产儿，但在全家悉心照顾下，生长发育状况良好。11月11日，在一次常规检查中，小洛熙发现患有“房间隔缺损”，有两个继发性孔，大小分别为3毫米和7毫米。邓女士曾查询相关案例，得知大部分患儿在过了一周岁后有很大可能性自愈。不过在咨询宁波市妇女儿童医院心脏科主任陈某某时，却被告知越早手术越好，因为会影响肺以及大脑发育。陈某某同时向家属表示该手术是心脏病中比较常见和难度系数不高的一个手术，风险只有两百分之一，预计操作时间为两个半到三小时。
11月14日上午7点48分，小洛熙接受了手术。不过，手术的进展和医院的预判相去甚远，直到当天下午3点都没有结束，家属多次致电医院要求了解情况，也未获医院回应。直到下午4点左右，一位医生才告知手术“不是很顺利”，在家属询问是否有生命危险时，该医生勉强回答“各占百分之五十”。当天下午4点37分，小洛熙才被推出手术室，此时的她已经全身插满管子，全脸发肿，状态极差，随后被推入儿科重症监护室。尽管此时医生仍声称手术结果成功，但邓女士直觉“女儿已经不行了”，要求调动上海合作专家前来抢救。医院答应配合，但邓女士表示，“从头到尾上海专家没有来过”。晚上10点03分，医院宣告小洛熙死亡。据邓女士描述，此时的小洛熙已经全脸黑肿、身上处处血迹、眼角挂泪、嘴巴不闭合。
家属质疑医院隐瞒实情，查看监控遭暴力阻挠
事后家属才得知，当天下午1点多时，手术已经结束，但医生又进行过“第二次重新手术”，此时的小洛熙已生命垂危，但医院却向家属隐瞒了实情。手术时间也比术前预估的多出了三倍，从进手术室到术后结束总共将近9小时，实际全麻时间长达7小时12分钟。家属认为，全麻时间过长外加二次开胸，是导致小洛熙离世的主要原因。
之后，医院拒绝了家属查看手术监控的要求，并出动大量保安人员强行将家属拉扯到了没有监控的区域。邓女士表示，她在此期间遭到保安殴打。在17日晚的天一广场，邓女士向网友展示了身上的部分伤情——大腿上的一大块淤青。
家属网络求助获得大量网友支持
在正常沟通失败后，邓女士选择了网络求助。在网络上，邓女士用长文详细讲述了事件经过，并提出了自己的三个诉求：一.要求“省卫健委”派专家组彻查、还原术中视频以及手术医疗事故真相。二.要求陈某某公开致歉，还女儿安息。三.要求院方公开对陈某某处理意见，吊销医师证，避免其危害其他家庭。
邓女士的遭遇迅速引发了网友的关注，大批网友在微博、小红书等社交媒体上接力发声支持邓女士。有网友指出，涉事医生陈某某并非初犯，小洛熙已经是其第三个受害宝宝。今年6月，陈某某曾被举报治死过一个1岁大的孩子，不过，院方将此事“压下来了”。还有网友指出，“房间隔缺损”在普通人群中常见，尤其是“软圆孔未闭合不超过5mm”通常不需格外关注和手术，会建议家长等待一岁或几岁后再复查。
后续：医院在压力之下公开回应，大量相关网文被删除
11月17日，宁波市妇幼医院作出回应称：已对涉事的医生展开调查并停诊，将配合家属依法维权，若存在医疗过错将依法处置。宁波市卫健委也同步表示，已将事件定性为“比较重大医疗纠纷”，正依照相关条例处理。不过，与此同时，多条相关帖子在社交平台正在被删除或限流。
“Ningbo Baby ‘Little Luoxi’ Dies After Minimally Invasive Surgery; Mother’s Protest Draws Massive Online Support (2025.11.17)”
On the evening of November 17, at Tianyi Square in Haishu District, Ningbo, Ms. Deng — who had lost her infant daughter just one day earlier — recounted to supportive citizens how Little Luoxi passed away, and publicly accused Dr. Chen, director of the cardiology department at Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital. Over the previous two days, her story had gone viral on social media, drawing tens of millions of views. Many local residents arrived at Tianyi Square after seeing the news online. However, Ms. Deng’s attempt to seek accountability was blocked by the police.
Low-risk minimally invasive surgery goes wrong; 5-month-old baby dies
According to Ms. Deng, her daughter, born prematurely on May 26, 2025, had been growing well under careful family care. During a routine checkup on November 11, doctors discovered atrial septal defects — two secundum holes measuring 3 mm and 7 mm. After researching similar cases, Ms. Deng learned that many children naturally recover after age one. But Dr. Chen insisted surgery should be done early, claiming delayed treatment might affect lung and brain development. He also told the family the procedure was common and low-risk, with only a 1% complication rate and an expected duration of 2.5 to 3 hours.
Little Luoxi underwent surgery at 7:48 a.m. on November 14. However, the operation dragged on far beyond expectations — it still had not concluded by 3 p.m. The family repeatedly called the hospital for updates but received no response. Around 4 p.m., a doctor finally informed them the surgery was “not going very smoothly,” and reluctantly admitted that the chances of survival were “fifty-fifty.” At 4:37 p.m., the baby was wheeled out of the operating room, swollen and covered in tubes, and transferred to the ICU. Although doctors still claimed the procedure had been successful, Ms. Deng immediately sensed that “my daughter was already gone” and requested emergency assistance from partner specialists in Shanghai. The hospital agreed, but according to Ms. Deng, “no Shanghai doctor ever came.” At 10:03 p.m., the hospital pronounced Little Luoxi dead. Ms. Deng described her daughter’s face as severely swollen and darkened, with blood marks and tears still visible.
Family suspects the hospital concealed critical information; attempts to view footage met with force
The family later learned that the initial surgery had actually ended around 1 p.m., but doctors performed a second procedure afterward. By then, Little Luoxi was already in critical condition — yet none of this was disclosed to the family. The total procedure lasted nearly nine hours, with 7 hours and 12 minutes of general anesthesia. The family believes prolonged anesthesia and a second opening of the chest directly led to the baby’s death.
The hospital refused the family’s request to review surgical footage and deployed security staff to forcibly drag them into an area without surveillance cameras. Ms. Deng said she was beaten by security guards. At Tianyi Square, she showed supporters a large bruise on her thigh.
Online support surges as the mother turns to the internet for help
After failing to communicate with the hospital, Ms. Deng turned to social media, posting a detailed account and listing three demands:
- The provincial health commission must dispatch an expert team to investigate and disclose the surgical footage and truth behind the incident.
- Dr. Chen must publicly apologize so that her daughter may “rest in peace.”
- The hospital must announce disciplinary actions against Dr. Chen, including revoking his medical license to prevent future harm.
Her post quickly gained widespread attention. Thousands of users on Weibo, Xiaohongshu, and other platforms amplified her story. Some pointed out that Dr. Chen had been involved in previous incidents; in June, he was accused of causing the death of another one-year-old child, but the hospital allegedly suppressed the case. Others noted that atrial septal defects are common and that holes under 5 mm typically require only observation rather than surgery.
After public pressure, the hospital issues a statement; online posts begin disappearing
On November 17, Ningbo Women and Children’s Hospital announced it had suspended Dr. Chen and opened an investigation, promising to cooperate with the family and address any medical malpractice according to law. The Ningbo Health Commission also stated that the incident had been classified as a “major medical dispute.” Meanwhile, many related posts on social media began disappearing or being restricted.