山东德州爆发学生“起义”:怒砸校舍,教官溃逃(2026.02.01)

2月1日晚,山东省德州市,一场震惊全网的学生“起义”在暗夜中爆发。当晚,德州环帝祥龙素质教育基地内,长期维系的高压秩序被打破。没有整齐划一的口号,取而代之的是玻璃破碎的脆响与少年们积压已久的怒火。长期饱受压迫的学生们突破了封锁,砸毁了象征囚禁的宿舍门窗。而平日里手持棍棒、对学生颐指气使的教官们,在真正的反抗面前,竟集体溃散,落荒而逃。

公开资料显示,涉事机构“环帝祥龙素质教育基地”隶属于山东环帝锦辉教育管理有限公司。 该机构对外标榜为聚焦青少年成长问题的正规化培训基地,实则是一家典型的“戒网瘾”及行为矫正学校。这类机构在中国长期存在,普遍以军事化、封闭式、惩罚性管理著称。据悉,该校规模约二三百人,分为一到三部。此次爆发抗议的正是管理最为严苛的“三部”。据知情者透露,校内教官多为两年义务兵退役人员,管理手段极度严酷,甚至心理扭曲,体罚已成常态。学生犯错后被棍棒殴打,关禁闭已屡见不鲜,且校内住宿简陋,饮食条件极为恶劣。

反抗的种子早已埋下,而导火索是教官再一次对学生实施了殴打。 据悉,行动由一名“学生助教”发起。愤怒的学生们砸毁了门窗及大量宿舍设施,并一度与教官发生激烈肢体冲突,有学生在冲突中受伤。事态失控后,教官群体集体逃离了学校,一些学生也离开了营地。之后,警察介入并封锁了学校。

长期以来,此类学校始终游走在教育、培训与心理干预的监管灰色地带。 它们以“为孩子好”为名,利用封闭、恐惧和绝对服从来建立秩序,却极少能真正解决青少年的心理问题。将孩子送进此类机构,往往是部分家庭在教育失败后的甩锅式选择:父母不愿面对亲子关系的裂痕,不愿处理陪伴缺失与深层心理需求,便企图将问题交付给一套简单粗暴的“改造系统”来解决。

在这类高墙之内,悲剧层出不穷,德州少年的怒火,实则由无数历史悲剧的血泪铺就。 从2009年的邓森山,到2014年的玲玲,再到2017年的李傲;从臭名昭著的豫章书院,到河南雅圣思、安徽正能……德州环帝学校的这场暴动,不是一群暴徒的狂欢,而是无数个“李傲”和“玲玲”在绝境中发出的求生嘶吼。

Student “Uprising” Erupts in Dezhou, Shandong: Dorms Trashed, Instructors Flee in Panic (February 1, 2026)

On the night of February 1st, a student “uprising” that sent shockwaves across the internet erupted under the cover of darkness in Dezhou, Shandong Province. That night, inside the Dezhou Huandi Xianglong Quality Education Base, the long-maintained order of oppression was shattered. There were no uniform slogans; instead, the air was filled with the crisp sound of shattering glass and the long-suppressed fury of the youths. Students, who had long endured oppression, broke through the blockade and smashed the dormitory doors and windows that symbolized their imprisonment. Meanwhile, the instructors—who usually brandished batons and lorded over the students—collectively crumbled and fled in panic when faced with genuine resistance.

Public records indicate that the institution involved, “Huandi Xianglong Quality Education Base,” is a subsidiary of Shandong Huandi Jinhui Education Management Co., Ltd. While the institution markets itself as a professional training base focused on youth development issues, it is, in reality, a typical “internet addiction treatment” and behavior correction school. Institutions of this nature have long existed in China, notorious for their militarized, enclosed, and punitive management styles. It is reported that the school houses approximately 200 to 300 students, divided into three sections. The protest erupted in “Section 3,” known for having the harshest management. According to insiders, most of the instructors are retired two-year conscripts who employ extremely harsh management tactics. Some are described as psychologically twisted, and corporal punishment has become the norm. It is common occurrence for students to be beaten with batons or placed in solitary confinement for minor infractions. Furthermore, the living conditions are squalid, and the food is appalling.

The seeds of resistance had been sown long ago, but the spark that lit the fuse was yet another instance of an instructor beating a student. Reports suggest the action was initiated by a “student assistant.” Enraged students smashed doors, windows, and extensive dormitory facilities, engaging in violent physical clashes with the instructors. Some students were injured during the conflict. After the situation spiraled out of control, the instructors fled the school en masse, and some students also left the camp. Subsequently, police intervened and cordoned off the school.

For a long time, such schools have operated in a regulatory gray area between education, training, and psychological intervention. Under the guise of “doing it for the child’s own good,” they establish order through confinement, fear, and absolute obedience, yet rarely solve the adolescents’ underlying psychological issues. Sending children to such institutions is often a way for some families to “pass the buck” following perceived educational failures: unwilling to face the fractures in the parent-child relationship or address the lack of companionship and deep psychological needs, parents attempt to outsource the problem to a crude and simplistic “reform system” for a solution.

Within these high walls, tragedies are endless. The fury of the Dezhou youths is paved with the blood and tears of countless historical tragedies. From Deng Senshan in 2009, to Lingling in 2014, and Li Ao in 2017; from the notorious Yuzhang Academy to Henan Yashengsi and Anhui Zhengneng… The riot at Dezhou Huandi School was not the frenzy of a mob, but the desperate roar for survival from countless “Li Aos” and “Linglings” trapped in a hopeless situation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *