「遵义新生婴儿疑因护士疏忽致夭折，家属维权陷困境（2025.10.22）」2025年10月22日，遵义医科大学附属医院发生一起医疗事故，一名仅出生六天的新生婴儿，因护士喂奶后玩忽职守，疑似导致窒息死亡。事发后，悲痛的家属在医院维权数日，婴儿母亲多次情绪崩溃试图跳楼。
事发经过：喂奶后护士离开玩手机，婴儿长时间无人照看
据家属透露，这名婴儿在孕期及生产过程中各项指标均正常，医生评分为“满分10分”，身体健康，仅因黄疸指数偏高，约为22，被医生强烈建议住院治疗。悲剧发生在22日凌晨： 监控显示， 凌晨2时许，一名值班男护士为婴儿喂奶，直接将奶瓶放置在婴儿口中后，便离开并开始玩手机，7分钟后才取下奶瓶。凌晨2点30分至5点17分的近3个小时内，婴儿曾持续哭闹、烦躁不安，但护士一直在玩手机，没有对婴儿进行过巡视检查。之前，家属曾缴纳了1000元的“特级护理费”，按规定，护士应该15分钟查看一次婴儿。直到凌晨5点17分换尿布时，护士才发现孩子已无心跳，随后医院才进行抢救。5点55分，医生才电话通知家属，称孩子“出现病情变化”。当家属于早上6点赶到病房时，孩子已被宣布死亡。家属强烈怀疑婴儿在吃奶时呛奶后发生严重窒息，但由于护士玩忽职守、延误抢救，最终酿成悲剧。家属指出，在婴儿持续大哭、烦躁不安的近3小时里，本应守护生命的心电监护仪也未发出任何预警，可能根本未正确连接。
医院应对：推诿、病历混乱与冷血言论
医院事后的处理态度，更进一步激化了矛盾：事发后数小时内，医院无人出面解释或处理。家属多次寻求沟通，却遭到推诿和敷衍。医院给出的死因是“肺出血导致窒息”。但家属发现封存的病历中竟夹杂着其他婴儿的危重记录，且一份需父亲签字的文件，签署时间早于家属接触材料的时间。当家属质疑护理流程时，涉事护士始终沉默，连一句“对不起”都没有。医务科人员甚至说出“死的是你家孩儿，又不是我家孩儿”的冷漠言语；有医生则回应：“死都死了，还能怎么办。”直到当天下午4点半，医院纪委书记才首次出面，称“将依法依规、公平公正处理”。
家属维权陷困境
孩子离世后，在医院维权的家属多次遭到警察驱赶，发布到网络的相关信息也很快便受到限流或屏蔽，并被一些来历不明的“水军”指责为“医闹”。家属希望将当天的监控视频拍摄下来并上传到网络，但被警察以“拍照录像涉嫌侵犯其他小孩隐私”为由阻止。目前，医院纪委已介入调查，但据家属透露，纪委人员称“同意调查，但不同意公布”。家属表示，发视频不是为了涨粉，只希望让公众看到事实真相，追究相关人员的责任。孩子舅舅在一份声明中写道：“我们只要事实真相，该追责追责。在此我吐槽一句，你们洗白的方式，还不如洁厕灵来得干净。”
“Newborn Baby in Zunyi Dies After Suspected Nurse Negligence; Family Faces Obstacles in Seeking Justice (Oct 22, 2025)”
On October 22, 2025, a tragic medical incident occurred at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University. A newborn baby, only six days old, allegedly died of suffocation after a nurse neglected her duty while feeding him. In the days following the incident, the heartbroken family stayed at the hospital demanding answers. The baby’s mother reportedly suffered repeated emotional breakdowns and attempted to jump from the building in despair.
Incident Details: Nurse Left the Baby Unattended to Use Her Phone After Feeding
According to the family, the baby’s prenatal and delivery indicators were all normal. Doctors rated his health as a “perfect 10,” and he was considered fully healthy. He was only admitted for treatment because of slightly elevated jaundice levels (around 22).
The tragedy took place in the early hours of October 22. Surveillance footage shows that at around 2 a.m., a male nurse on duty fed the baby by placing a milk bottle in his mouth and then walked away to use his phone. He didn’t remove the bottle until seven minutes later.
Between 2:30 a.m. and 5:17 a.m.—nearly three hours—the baby was visibly crying and restless, but the nurse remained on his phone and did not check on him even once. The family had paid an additional 1,000 yuan for “special care,” which, according to hospital policy, required nurses to check on infants every 15 minutes.
At 5:17 a.m., when changing the baby’s diaper, the nurse finally noticed that the child had no heartbeat. Resuscitation began only afterward. At 5:55 a.m., the doctor called the family, saying the baby’s “condition had changed.” When the parents arrived at 6 a.m., the child had already been pronounced dead.
The family strongly suspects that the baby choked on milk and suffered severe asphyxiation. They believe that the nurse’s negligence and delayed response directly caused the death. They also noted that the heart monitor, which should have issued an alert during distress, remained silent—possibly because it had not been properly connected in the first place.
Hospital Response: Evasion, Tampered Records, and Cold Remarks
The hospital’s handling of the aftermath only deepened tensions. For several hours after the incident, no hospital official came forward to explain or take responsibility. The family’s repeated attempts to seek answers were met with evasions and indifference.
The hospital claimed the cause of death was “pulmonary hemorrhage leading to suffocation.” However, the family discovered that the sealed medical records contained pages from another baby’s critical care file, and one document requiring the father’s signature was dated before the family had even seen it.
When questioned about the nursing process, the nurse involved stayed silent—without even offering an apology. A staff member from the hospital’s medical department reportedly told the family coldly, “It’s your baby who died, not mine.” Another doctor added, “What’s done is done. What can you do now?”
It wasn’t until 4:30 p.m. that the hospital’s discipline inspection secretary appeared, promising to handle the matter “lawfully and fairly.”
Family’s Struggle for Justice
Since the baby’s death, the grieving family’s attempts to seek accountability have faced continuous obstruction. Police repeatedly forced them out of the hospital, and posts about the incident were quickly restricted or removed online. Paid online commenters also accused the family of being “troublemakers.”
When the family tried to film the surveillance footage to preserve evidence, police stopped them, citing “privacy concerns for other infants.” The hospital’s internal discipline committee has since opened an investigation, but according to the family, they were told that “an investigation will be conducted, but the results won’t be made public.”
The baby’s relatives stated that their only goal is transparency and accountability. As the baby’s uncle wrote in a statement:
“We just want the truth and for those responsible to be held accountable. To be honest, your attempts to whitewash this are dirtier than a toilet cleaner.”