「贵州龙里数百高中生集会反抗监狱式管理（2025.11.17）」贵州龙里县一中的数百名学生，本周一发起集体行动，聚集在宿舍楼前高喊口号，抗议学校于当天开始实施的“监狱式”作息制度。
事件的起因源于龙里县一中于11月11日公布的新版作息时间安排，按照该作息时间要求，学生每天需要完成13节课程外加早读。为了塞进如此高密度的课程安排，学校要求学生早上 6 点起床、晚上 11 点10 分就寝。这意味着学生每晚仅能睡约不到7小时，即便再加上一小时午休，也低于中国国家卫健委建议的“高中生应保证8小时睡眠”的标准。更令学生不满的是，新的规定要求午休必须在教室内进行，不得返回宿舍。许多学生表示，趴在课桌上根本无法获得有效休息，如此高强度的课程安排与被压缩的睡眠时间，无疑将会摧毁他们的身心健康。
在作息时间表公布后，学生们迅速在社交媒体上表达了强烈不满，并引发大规模共鸣。其中，一篇题为《被时间绑架的青春》的文章在学生群体中广为流传，它将矛头直指这种畸形的教育模式，尖锐地质问：“这究竟是培育人才的校园，还是生产流水线的工厂？”文章指出，这种教育观不仅透支着学生的身体健康——导致“近视率攀升、睡眠不足、心理问题低龄化”，更摧毁了他们的学习热情与内在驱动力，让“厌学”成为青春里最沉重的注脚。有学生更是直言：“比监狱都还恐怖，只是活生生的压榨。” 这些声音为最终的集体行动埋下了火种。
11月17日，在新的作息时间开始执行的当天，数百名学生默契地聚集到宿舍门口，高喊“开门”等口号，表达对学校的监狱式管理方法的不满，并要求进入寝室。据现场学生透露，当时有多名老师试图阻拦学生，但未能成功。最终，迫于学生们团结一致的压力，学校管理层做出了初步让步，当天立即允许学生回寝室午休，并决定今后的午休时间，也将在寝室内进行。
不过，截至11月18日，学校尚未决定是否修改作息时间，缩短学生的学习时长。对此学生们表示，目前，他们还在与学校抗争，并希望能取得好的结果。
“Hundreds of High School Students in Longli, Guizhou Rally Against ‘Prison-Style’ Management (2025.11.17)”
Hundreds of students at Longli No.1 High School in Guizhou launched a collective action this Monday, gathering in front of their dormitory building and chanting slogans to protest the “prison-style” schedule the school began enforcing that day.
The incident stemmed from a new timetable the school released on November 11. According to the plan, students must complete 13 class periods each day, plus morning reading. To fit in such an intense workload, the school requires students to wake up at 6 a.m. and go to bed at 11:10 p.m. This means students get less than seven hours of sleep per night— even with a one-hour lunch break added, it still falls short of the eight hours recommended by China’s National Health Commission for high school students. What angered students further was that the new rules require them to take their lunch break in the classroom and forbid returning to the dorms. Many said that sleeping face-down on a desk cannot provide any real rest. Such high-intensity scheduling and reduced sleep, they argue, will inevitably damage their physical and mental health.
After the timetable was published, students quickly voiced strong dissatisfaction on social media, sparking widespread resonance. Among the posts, an article titled “Youth Kidnapped by Time” spread widely among students. It sharply criticized this distorted education model and asked: “Is this a school meant to nurture talent, or a factory assembly line?” The article said this approach not only harms students’ health—leading to “rising myopia rates, sleep deprivation, and younger psychological issues”—but also destroys their motivation to learn, making “academic burnout” a heavy label on their youth. Some even said, “It’s worse than a prison—just pure exploitation.” These voices laid the groundwork for the eventual collective action.
On November 17, the day the new schedule took effect, hundreds of students gathered in front of the dormitory, chanting “Open the door!” to express their discontent with the school’s prison-like management and to demand access to their rooms. According to students on site, several teachers tried to stop them but failed. In the end, under the pressure of united student action, the school administration made a temporary concession: students were allowed to return to their dorms for lunch break that day, and the school announced that future lunch breaks would also be taken in the dorms.
However, as of November 18, the school has not decided whether it will revise the timetable or reduce study hours. Students say they are still negotiating with the school and hope for a positive outcome.