「投稿：扬州大学非机动车整治新规引发学生强烈不满，质疑校方与青桔存在利益输送（2026.06.25）」6月25日，扬州大学校方宣布，将于下学期起对校园内非机动车进行集中整治：2026级新生不得自行购买电动车；已有合规车牌的学生须更换电子牌照；同时，校方宣布将同步引入共享自行车与少量共享电动车，唯一招标商为”青桔”，而原有的校园电动车牌照申请通道已连续停办三年，停转近一年，导致无牌学生面临车辆被强制处理却无法补办手续的境地。
学生指出，校方此举存在多重问题：其一，共享车辆仅限校内骑行，且投放量严重不足——据校方招标文件显示，6个校区合计仅投放1000辆共享自行车、200辆共享电动车，而全校师生总数逾5.6万人，部分校区无食堂、图书馆，学生需跨校区通勤，远不能满足实际需求；其二，校方变相诱导学生低价转卖私人电动车，自己则提前对接回收厂商，被质疑从中获利；其三，校园代步业务由青桔独家垂断经营，招标合同及收益分成从未公开，存在利益输送嫌疑；其四，共享电动车定价每学期37.18元，远高于自购车的长期使用成本，且未经听证程序；其五，校方以”锂电安全”为由清退私人电动车，却对同样具有自燃风险的青桔共享车辆不作要求，标准双重、逻辑矛盾。
事件曝光后，学生在社交平台及校园论坛集中表达不满，提出五项诉求，包括恢复牌照登记通道、增加共享车投放量、公开招标合同及收益分成、出台合理的过渡安置方案等，但截至目前校方仍未正面回应。
投稿人还透露，扬州大学长期存在收费高于社会的现象，在洗衣、超市等方面尤为显著，对爆料者采取严厉管制，藉由摸排手段捂嘴，强力控制舆情舆论，学生权益长期受损，发声无门，已长期为人诟病。
Submission: Yangzhou University’s New Crackdown on Non-Motorized Vehicles Sparks Student Outrage, Allegations of Profit-Sharing Arrangement With Qingju (2026.06.25)
On June 25, Yangzhou University announced that starting next semester, it would launch a campus-wide crackdown on non-motorized vehicles: incoming students in the Class of 2026 will be barred from purchasing their own electric bikes; students with currently valid license plates will be required to switch to electronic plates. At the same time, the university announced it would introduce shared bicycles and a small number of shared electric bikes, with Qingju (Qingju Bike) as the sole designated provider. The university’s previous license plate registration system for campus electric bikes, however, has been suspended for three consecutive years and has not been operational for nearly a year, leaving students without plates facing the forced confiscation of their vehicles with no way to register them retroactively.
Students have identified multiple problems with the policy. First, the shared bikes can only be used within campus and supply is grossly inadequate — according to the university’s own bidding documents, the six campuses combined will receive only 1,000 shared bicycles and 200 shared electric bikes, while the university has more than 56,000 students and staff in total. Some campuses lack cafeterias or libraries, forcing students to commute between campuses, a need the supply falls far short of meeting. Second, students say the university is effectively pressuring them to sell their personal electric bikes at low prices while the university itself has already lined up scrap dealers to buy them, raising suspicions that the university profits from the arrangement. Third, campus mobility services are monopolized exclusively by Qingju, with the bidding contract and revenue-sharing terms never disclosed, raising suspicion of improper benefit transfers. Fourth, the shared electric bikes are priced at 37.18 yuan per semester, far exceeding the long-term cost of owning a private bike, and the pricing was set without any public hearing. Fifth, the university cites lithium battery safety as grounds for removing private electric bikes, yet applies no such requirement to Qingju’s shared bikes, which carry the same fire risk — a glaring double standard.
After the policy became public, students voiced their frustration on social media and campus forums, raising five demands, including reopening the plate registration system, increasing the supply of shared bikes, disclosing the bidding contract and revenue-sharing terms, and introducing a reasonable transition plan. As of now, the university has not issued a public response.
The submitter also noted that Yangzhou University has long charged students more than market rates, particularly for laundry and convenience store services, while clamping down harshly on whistleblowers — using surveillance tactics to silence dissent and tightly controlling public discourse on campus. Students’ rights, the submitter said, have long gone unaddressed, with no real channel for grievances to be heard, a situation that has drawn criticism for years.