2026年1月份，昨天频道共发布了发生在中国的群体抗争事件50起。
一、 抗争群体
- 工人群体（17起，占 34%）
- 构成：建筑工人(9起)、制造工人(4起)、物业保洁(2起)、环卫工人(1起)、煤矿工人(1起)。
- 核心诉求：全部围绕劳资冲突（讨要欠薪、抗议降薪、企业秘密搬迁逃避赔偿等）。
- 业主群体（7起，占 14%）
- 烂尾楼盘要房、抗议开发商虚假宣传、抵制物业乱收停车费等。
- 投资者群体（7起，占 14%）
- 主要针对金融理财诈骗跑路、黄金珠宝暴雷（如深圳水贝事件）。
- 农民群体（6起，占 12%）
- 反抗政府/村霸强征强占土地、讨要被拖欠多年的巨额粮款、反强制火葬。
- 死者/患者家属（5起，占 10%）
- 校园离奇死亡、霸凌致死事件求真相，以及严重医疗事故索赔。
- 其他群体（8起，占 16%）
- 学生(2起)、摊贩(2起)、网民(1起)、信徒(1起)、储户(1起)、民代幼教师(1起)。
二、 地点分布情况
广东 8起（全部集中在深圳，由珠宝暴雷和劳工罢工主导）；
河南 5起（驻马店、郑州）。
湖南 (4起)、福建 (4起)、四川 (3起)、安徽 (3起)、海南 (3起)、云南 (3起)。
重庆、山西、广西、浙江、山东、内蒙古（各2起）；上海、天津、湖北、陕西、黑龙江（各1起）。
三、 引发原因：
工人讨薪与劳资冲突（17起，占 34%）：企业欠薪跑路、降薪、关厂/搬迁不赔偿、强行垄断工人饮食等。
公权力与民生冲突（9起，占 18%）：城管暴力没收摊贩设备、政府/村霸强征强占土地、拖欠农户千万粮款、强拆村民自筹寺庙、强推火葬政策等。
房产乱象与烂尾楼（8起，占 16%）：农民安置房/商品房烂尾、开发商虚假宣传、物业乱收费及违规乱建等。
社会底线及信任危机（8起，占 16%）：学校隐瞒学生死亡真相、校园霸凌致死、医院严重误诊拒不担责、学校违规取消假期强制留校等。
金融与投资暴雷（7起，占 14%）：民间理财违约跑路、深圳水贝黄金珠宝平台百亿级暴雷诈骗等。
银行储户维权（1起，占 2%）：邮储银行网点欺诈储户“存款变保险”。
四、 规模大小统计
- 1-9人：6 起（占 12%）
- 10-99人：28 起（占 56%）
- 100-999人：11 起（占 22%）
- （1000-9999人）：5 起（占 10%）。(包括：天津美克家居千人罢工、云南数千农民反强制火葬、宁波上千网民集会、广西贵港千名学生冲校、深圳千名投资者抗议)
五、出动警察及暴力镇压情况
- 警察到场率：高达 68%（共34起事件有警察出动）。
- 暴力驱散或抓捕：有 17起 事件明确发生了警察施暴、殴打或抓捕维权者（占总事件的34%）。
- 镇压特征：警察的暴力抓捕行动高度集中在“投资者/业主维权”和“农民涉地维权”中（例如深圳水贝冲突、湖南长沙业主堵路、内蒙古农民集会）。
注：同一事件如果发生在两个不同的日期里，算两起。
以下是为您翻译的英文版本：
In January 2026, the “Yesterday” channel published a total of 50 group protest incidents that occurred in China.
I. Protest Groups
- Workers (17 incidents, 34%)
- Composition: Construction workers (9 incidents), manufacturing workers (4), property cleaners (2), sanitation workers (1), state-owned coal mine workers (1).
- Core demands: All revolved around labor conflicts (demanding unpaid wages, protesting pay cuts, secret factory relocations to evade compensation, etc.).
- Homeowners (7 incidents, 14%)
- Demanding homes from unfinished (rotten-tail) housing projects, protesting developers’ false advertising, and boycotting arbitrary parking fees charged by property management.
- Investors (7 incidents, 14%)
- Primarily targeting financial wealth management fraud/absconding, and the collapse of gold and jewelry platforms (such as the Shenzhen Shuibei incident).
- Farmers (6 incidents, 12%)
- Resisting forced land requisition and occupation by the government or village bullies, demanding massive grain payments in arrears for years, and opposing forced cremations.
- Families of the Deceased/Patients (5 incidents, 10%)
- Seeking the truth behind bizarre campus deaths and fatal bullying incidents, as well as demanding compensation for severe medical malpractice.
- Other Groups (8 incidents, 16%)
- Students (2), street vendors (2), netizens (1), religious believers (1), bank depositors (1), and community/substitute/kindergarten teachers (1).
II. Geographic Distribution
- Guangdong: 8 incidents (all concentrated in Shenzhen, dominated by the jewelry platform collapse and labor strikes);
- Henan: 5 incidents (Zhumadian, Zhengzhou);
- Hunan (4), Fujian (4), Sichuan (3), Anhui (3), Hainan (3), Yunnan (3);
- Chongqing, Shanxi, Guangxi, Zhejiang, Shandong, Inner Mongolia (2 incidents each); Shanghai, Tianjin, Hubei, Shaanxi, Heilongjiang (1 incident each).
III. Causes of Incidents
- Worker Unpaid Wages and Labor Conflicts (17 incidents, 34%): Enterprises absconding with unpaid wages, pay cuts, uncompensated factory closures/relocations, forced monopolies on workers’ food, etc.
- Public Power and Livelihood Conflicts (9 incidents, 18%): Chengguan (urban management) violently confiscating vendors’ equipment, government/village bullies forcibly requisitioning and occupying land, owing farmers tens of millions in grain payments, forced demolition of self-funded village temples, and the forced implementation of cremation policies.
- Real Estate Chaos and Unfinished Buildings (8 incidents, 16%): Unfinished farmer resettlement housing and commercial housing, developers’ false advertising, arbitrary property fees, and illegal constructions.
- Social Bottom-Line and Trust Crisis (8 incidents, 16%): Schools covering up the truth of student deaths, fatal campus bullying, hospitals’ severe misdiagnoses and refusal to take responsibility, schools illegally canceling holidays and forcing students to stay on campus.
- Financial and Investment Collapse (7 incidents, 14%): Default and absconding in private wealth management, the multi-billion yuan fraud collapse of the Shenzhen Shuibei gold and jewelry platform, etc.
- Bank Depositors’ Rights Defense (1 incident, 2%): Postal Savings Bank branches defrauding depositors by converting “deposits into insurance.”
IV. Scale of Protests
- 1-9 people: 6 incidents (12%)
- 10-99 people: 28 incidents (56%)
- 100-999 people: 11 incidents (22%)
- 1,000-9,999 people: 5 incidents (10%). (Including: the strike of thousands of workers at Markor Home Furnishings in Tianjin, thousands of farmers protesting forced cremation in Yunnan, a gathering of over a thousand netizens in Ningbo, a thousand students charging out of the school gates in Guigang, Guangxi, and protests by thousands of investors in Shenzhen).
V. Police Deployment and Violent Suppression
- Police Presence Rate: As high as 68% (Police were deployed to maintain stability in a total of 34 incidents).
- Violent Dispersal or Arrests: In 17 incidents, police explicitly used violence, beatings, or arrested rights defenders (accounting for 34% of total incidents).
- Characteristics of Suppression/Stability Maintenance: Violent police arrests were highly concentrated in “Investor/Homeowner Rights Defense” and “Farmer Land-Related Rights Defense” (e.g., the Shenzhen Shuibei conflicts, Changsha homeowners blocking roads in Hunan, and farmer gatherings in Inner Mongolia). In contrast, in incidents solely involving construction workers demanding unpaid wages, although police frequently arrived to maintain order, they rarely directly arrested the protesting workers.
(Note: If the same event occurred on two different dates, it is counted as two separate incidents.)