「武汉上千市民集体抗争，怒拆六个小区收费杆（2026.03.24）」2026年3月24日夜，湖北武汉东湖高新区左岭新城，一场声势浩大的集体抗争行动震动全城。上千名居民自发聚集，接连拆除六个小区的收费道闸，终结了物业强制收费的计划。
起因
左岭新城是武汉东湖高新区规模最大的回迁安置社区，自2014年起陆续入住，现有常住居民近十万人，其中包括原左岭街道约四万名拆迁村民。社区建成十余年来，从未向居民收取停车费。
2026年元旦前后，小区物业突然引入一家第三方公司，宣布向住户征收每月30元的停车费，并在各小区出入口安装收费栏杆。消息一出，迅速在居民中引发强烈反响。
多名居民表示，小区土地属于回迁安置性质，居民已缴纳物业费，理应享有免费停车权利。更令居民不满的是，物业方在推行收费前既未召开业主大会，也未征询住户意见。部分居民还担忧，若此次收费顺利推行，日后费用可能还将逐年上涨。
冲突持续升级
自从强制收费政策实施以来，零星反抗持续不断，多个社区出现了破坏、拆除甚至驾车撞毁收费栏杆的事件。3月19日起，白浒社区的老年人们率先发起了集体抗争行动——在进入小区受阻后，他们选择堵门抗议，与收费人员发生多次正面冲突。
此后数日，抵制情绪持续蔓延。居民相互通知，呼吁联合行动。其间，有业主援引《民法典》第275条、第278条等相关条款，撰文阐述本次收费在程序与权属层面存在的法律问题，呼吁邻居团结维权，该文章在社区内广泛流传。
千人强拆六个社区收费杆
3月24日晚，事态进一步激化。抗争行动首先在白浒社区点燃——部分老人与收费人员短暂对峙后，随即将该社区所有收费杆强行拆除。消息迅速传开，老人们的行动得到了其他住户的支持，数以千计的村民走出家门，参与了此次抗争行动。
此后，抗争队伍以摧枯拉朽之势依次涌入玉泉社区、左岭四社区、三社区、二社区、一社区，将各处收费栏杆逐一摧毁。至当晚行动结束，六个社区的全部收费栏杆已荡然无存。这场由老人率先点燃、迅速席卷全社区的集体抗争，以居民的全面胜利告终——但能否守住这一成果，仍有待后续观察。
Thousands of Wuhan Residents Resist Collectively, Tearing Down Toll Barriers Across Six Residential Communities (2026.03.24)
On the night of March 24, 2026, a large-scale collective act of resistance shook the city of Wuhan. In Zuoling New Town, located in the East Lake High-Tech Development Zone of Hubei Province, thousands of residents spontaneously gathered and proceeded to dismantle toll gate barriers at six residential communities one after another, putting an end to the property management company’s plan to impose mandatory parking fees.
Background
Zuoling New Town is the largest resettlement community in Wuhan’s East Lake High-Tech Zone. Residents began moving in from 2014 onward, and the community now has a permanent population of nearly 100,000, including approximately 40,000 villagers relocated from the original Zuoling Subdistrict. In the more than ten years since the community was established, residents had never been charged for parking.
Around the 2026 New Year, the property management company suddenly brought in a third-party firm and announced it would charge residents a monthly parking fee of 30 yuan, installing toll barriers at the entrances and exits of each community. The news immediately sparked a fierce backlash among residents.
Several residents stated that, given the resettlement nature of the land and the fact that they already pay property management fees, they are entitled to free parking. What further angered residents was that the property company had neither convened an owners’ assembly nor sought residents’ input before implementing the charges. Some residents also worried that if the fees were successfully introduced this time, costs could rise year after year going forward.
Escalating Conflict
Since the mandatory fee policy took effect, sporadic resistance had been ongoing — incidents of toll barriers being damaged, dismantled, or rammed by vehicles were reported across multiple communities. Starting March 19, elderly residents of Baihu Community were the first to launch a coordinated collective action: after being blocked from entering the community, they staged a sit-in protest at the gate, leading to multiple direct confrontations with fee collectors.
In the days that followed, the spirit of resistance continued to spread. Residents notified one another and called for collective action. During this period, one homeowner drew on Articles 275 and 278 of the Civil Code and other relevant provisions to write an article explaining the procedural and property-rights legal issues with the new charges, urging neighbors to stand together and defend their rights. The article circulated widely throughout the community.
Thousands Forcibly Dismantle Barriers Across Six Communities
By the evening of March 24, the situation escalated further. The resistance was ignited first in Baihu Community — after a brief standoff with the fee collectors, some elderly residents forcibly tore down all the toll barriers in that community. News spread quickly, and the elderly residents’ actions drew support from other homeowners. Thousands of villagers left their homes and joined the effort.
The wave of resistance then swept through Yuquan Community, Zuoling Community No. 4, No. 3, No. 2, and No. 1 in swift succession, with toll barriers at each location demolished one by one. By the time the night’s action was over, every single toll barrier across all six communities had been completely removed. This collective act of resistance — sparked first by the elderly and rapidly engulfing the entire community — ended in a total victory for the residents. Whether they can hold onto this outcome, however, remains to be seen.