中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年6月）
2026年6月，「昨天」项目共发布发生在中国的抗争事件46起。本月最受关注的是三起标志性事件：持续两个多月、波及逾百万商户的黑龙江“非暴力不合作”抗争运动，其规模为「昨天」项目建档以来最大；重庆爆发中国首次大规模反虐待动物集会，由网友与动物保护志愿者共同发起；安徽合肥逾千名居民集体上街，成功逼停一项大型垃圾中转站项目。此外，劳资纠纷、城管抢摊引发的冲突，以及浙江宁波“小洛熙”系列医疗事故维权事件持续发酵，构成本月抗争事件的另外三条主线。
一、抗争群体构成
各类工人与劳动者：11起（23.9%）
细分：制造工人（5起）、环卫工人（1起）、文职员工（1起）、超市员工（1起）、建筑工人（1起）、出租车司机（1起），以及被临时招募从事保安工作的学生（1起）。
业主及居民：6起（13.0%）
包括反对强拆、物业乱收费、旧物业拒绝离场、房产证无法办理、危险实验室及垃圾中转站项目等。
农民：4起（8.7%）
主要涉及强征土地，以及地方政府擅自改变村民户口性质、逃避集体土地权益分配等问题。
死者家属及相关维权者：5起（10.9%）
包括医疗事故、未成年人躲避渔政追赶溺亡，以及宁波“小洛熙”事件后续维权。
商户及参展商：4起（8.7%）
包括黑龙江百万商户集体罢市、广州商户牵马运货，以及深圳展会参展商连续维权。
摊贩及围观群众：4起（8.7%）
均与城管抢夺、查扣或拖走摊贩餐车有关。
动物保护人士及网友：2起（4.3%）
包括重庆数千人反虐待动物集会，以及浙江东阳女子抗议宠物猫被虐杀。
学生：2起（4.3%）
包括学生被所谓“强制扭转学校”人员带走，以及数百名高三学生突破校方阻拦、集体庆祝毕业。
访民：2起（4.3%）
包括访民在公安部门前唱歌控诉腐败，以及截访人员当街强行带走访民引发的反抗。
其他群体：6起（13.0%）
包括投保人、储户、乘客、基督教徒、网民及其他个体维权者。
二、地点分布情况
广东：12起
浙江：7起
四川、重庆：各4起
安徽、河北、湖南、贵州：各2起
黑龙江、湖北、海南、江西、陕西、山东、山西、甘肃、辽宁、北京：各1起
另有1起发生在公安部相关场所。
广东和浙江两地合计发生19起，占本月已发布事件总数的41.3%。广东事件主要集中在深圳、东莞、阳江、广州、清远、陆丰和汕头；浙江事件则主要集中在宁波，并涉及台州、杭州和东阳。
三、引发原因分布
欠薪、低薪及其他劳资纠纷：10起（21.7%）
具体包括：欠薪（5起）、工资过低（2起）、裁员不赔偿（1起）、克扣工资及赔偿不公（1起）、拖欠工资和社保并拒绝兑付员工集资款（1起）。
土地、住房及社区治理纠纷：9起（19.6%）
具体包括：强征土地（3起）、强拆（1起）、物业乱收费或拒绝退出（2起）、长期无法办理房产证（1起）、擅自改变村民户口性质以逃避土地权益分配（1起）、居民区附近建设危险实验室（1起）。
医疗事故及相关维权：5起（10.9%）
包括死者家属在医院讨说法遭警察镇压，以及宁波“小洛熙”家属和声援者被传唤、失联或施压等事件。
城管抢夺或查扣餐车：4起（8.7%）
成都、海口、宁波和阳江均发生摊贩站上餐车、阻止城管拖车的事件，其中多起吸引数百名群众围观声援。
虐待动物：2起（4.3%）
包括重庆大规模反虐待动物集会，以及浙江东阳宠物猫被虐杀后，主人在小区内公开抗议。
展会虚假宣传：2起（4.3%）
深圳一场跨境电商展被指采购商数量远低于宣传，甚至雇人冒充采购商，数百名参展商连续两天要求退费，部分愤怒商户随后砸毁展品。
环境及垃圾项目：2起（4.3%）
包括武汉居民反对危险废物实验室落户，以及合肥上千市民游行逼停大型垃圾中转项目。
其他原因：12起（26.1%）
包括政府乱检查、乱罚款，限制宗教信仰和悼念活动，保险退保纠纷，航空公司强制收费，存款被转为保险产品，限制商户运货工具，学生管理冲突、截访及执法追赶致人死亡等。
四、规模统计
1—9人：13起（28.3%）
10—99人：11起（23.9%）
100—999人：17起（37.0%）
1,000—9,999人：4起（8.7%）
百万人规模：1起（2.2%）
本月百人以上事件共22起，占全部事件的47.8%。其中，黑龙江商户罢市累计参与者超过百万人，是本月规模最大的抗争行动；重庆反虐待动物集会、西安万唯教育员工维权、九江联盛员工讨薪和合肥反垃圾项目游行的参与者均达到千人以上。
五、警察镇压情况
警察到场：20起，到场率约43.5%
明确发生暴力镇压或抓捕：10起，占全部事件约21.7%
在警察到场的20起事件中，有10起出现殴打、喷射辣椒水、强行拖拽、抓捕或带走维权者等情况，占警察到场事件的一半。
典型案例包括：河北邢台医疗事故死者家属讨说法遭警察喷射辣椒水；浙江台州村民反对强征土地遭警察殴打；重庆少年溺亡后，家属和民众游行遭警方镇压；重庆反虐待动物集会参与者遭抓捕和持续监控；武汉居民反对危险废物实验室落户，多人被抓；成都秋雨圣约教会礼拜遭警方冲击，多名教徒及儿童被带走；成都数百名业主堵路维权，多人被殴打抓捕；合肥反垃圾项目游行一度与警察发生冲突；湖南郴州业主索要房产证遭警察粗暴拖行；广东汕头村民占领村委、围堵干部期间遭到警方镇压。
Summary of Collective Protest Incidents in China
Published Cases Only — June 2026
In June 2026, the Yesterday Project published 46 collective protest incidents that occurred in China. Three landmark events drew the greatest attention during the month. The first was a nonviolent noncooperation movement in Heilongjiang that lasted for more than two months and involved over one million merchants, making it the largest protest documented by the Yesterday Project since its archive was established. The second was China’s first large-scale anti-animal-cruelty gathering, which broke out in Chongqing and was jointly initiated by netizens and animal-protection volunteers. The third took place in Hefei, Anhui, where more than 1,000 residents took to the streets and successfully forced the suspension of a large waste-transfer-station project.
In addition, labor disputes, clashes triggered by urban-management officers seizing vendors’ carts, and the continuing rights-defense campaign surrounding the medical-malpractice case of “Xiao Luoxi” in Ningbo, Zhejiang, formed three other major themes of protest during the month.
1. Composition of Protest Groups
Workers and other laborers: 11 incidents (23.9%)
Breakdown: factory workers, 5 incidents; sanitation workers, 1; office employees, 1; supermarket employees, 1; construction workers, 1; taxi drivers, 1; and students temporarily recruited to work as security guards, 1.
Homeowners and residents: 6 incidents (13.0%)
These included protests against forced demolitions, arbitrary property-management fees, former property-management companies refusing to leave residential compounds, the failure to issue property-ownership certificates, and proposed hazardous-laboratory and waste-transfer-station projects.
Farmers: 4 incidents (8.7%)
These mainly involved compulsory land expropriation and local authorities unilaterally changing villagers’ household-registration status in order to avoid distributing collective land rights and benefits.
Families of the deceased and related rights defenders: 5 incidents (10.9%)
These included medical-malpractice cases, the drowning of a minor while fleeing a fisheries-enforcement pursuit, and continuing rights-defense actions related to the “Xiao Luoxi” case in Ningbo.
Merchants and exhibitors: 4 incidents (8.7%)
These included the mass business shutdown involving more than one million merchants in Heilongjiang, a Guangzhou merchant using horses to transport goods, and two consecutive days of protests by exhibitors at a trade fair in Shenzhen.
Street vendors and onlookers: 4 incidents (8.7%)
All four incidents involved urban-management officers seizing, impounding, or towing away vendors’ food carts.
Animal-protection advocates and netizens: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included a gathering of several thousand people against animal cruelty in Chongqing and a protest by a woman in Dongyang, Zhejiang, after her pet cat was tortured and killed.
Students: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included a student being taken away by personnel from a so-called “compulsory correction school,” and several hundred graduating high-school students breaking through school restrictions to celebrate their graduation collectively.
Petitioners: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included petitioners singing outside a public-security agency to denounce corruption, and resistance triggered when interception personnel forcibly dragged away a petitioner in public.
Other groups: 6 incidents (13.0%)
These involved policyholders, bank depositors, airline passengers, Christians, netizens, and other individual rights defenders.
2. Geographic Distribution
- Guangdong: 12 incidents
- Zhejiang: 7 incidents
- Sichuan and Chongqing: 4 incidents each
- Anhui, Hebei, Hunan, and Guizhou: 2 incidents each
- Heilongjiang, Hubei, Hainan, Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Gansu, Liaoning, and Beijing: 1 incident each
- One additional incident occurred at a site connected to the Ministry of Public Security.
Guangdong and Zhejiang together accounted for 19 incidents, or 41.3% of all incidents published during the month. Incidents in Guangdong were mainly concentrated in Shenzhen, Dongguan, Yangjiang, Guangzhou, Qingyuan, Lufeng, and Shantou. Incidents in Zhejiang were concentrated mainly in Ningbo, with additional cases in Taizhou, Hangzhou, and Dongyang.
3. Distribution of Causes
Unpaid wages, low pay, and other labor disputes: 10 incidents (21.7%)
These included unpaid wages, 5 incidents; excessively low wages, 2; layoffs without compensation, 1; wage deductions and unfair compensation, 1; and unpaid wages and social-insurance contributions combined with refusal to repay employee investment funds, 1.
Land, housing, and community-governance disputes: 9 incidents (19.6%)
These included compulsory land expropriation, 3 incidents; forced demolition, 1; arbitrary property-management charges or refusal by former property managers to withdraw, 2; prolonged failure to issue property-ownership certificates, 1; unilateral changes to villagers’ household-registration status to avoid distributing land-related rights, 1; and the proposed construction of a hazardous laboratory near residential neighborhoods, 1.
Medical malpractice and related rights-defense actions: 5 incidents (10.9%)
These included families of deceased patients being suppressed by police while seeking accountability at hospitals, as well as incidents in which relatives and supporters connected to the “Xiao Luoxi” case in Ningbo were summoned, disappeared from public contact, or subjected to pressure.
Urban-management officers seizing or impounding food carts: 4 incidents (8.7%)
In Chengdu, Haikou, Ningbo, and Yangjiang, vendors climbed onto their food carts to prevent urban-management officers from towing them away. Several of these incidents attracted hundreds of onlookers who expressed support.
Animal cruelty: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included the large-scale anti-animal-cruelty gathering in Chongqing and a public protest inside a residential compound in Dongyang, Zhejiang, after a pet cat was tortured and killed.
False promotion by trade fairs: 2 incidents (4.3%)
A cross-border e-commerce exhibition in Shenzhen was accused of attracting far fewer buyers than advertised and even hiring people to pose as purchasers. Hundreds of exhibitors demanded refunds for two consecutive days, and some angry merchants later smashed exhibits.
Environmental and waste projects: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included Wuhan residents opposing the establishment of a hazardous-waste laboratory and more than 1,000 Hefei residents marching to force the suspension of a large waste-transfer-station project.
Other causes: 12 incidents (26.1%)
These included arbitrary inspections and fines by government agencies, restrictions on religious practice and memorial activities, disputes over insurance-policy cancellation, compulsory airline charges, bank deposits being converted into insurance products, restrictions on merchants’ transport tools, conflicts over student management, interception of petitioners, and deaths caused by law-enforcement pursuits.
4. Scale of Incidents
- 1–9 participants: 13 incidents (28.3%)
- 10–99 participants: 11 incidents (23.9%)
- 100–999 participants: 17 incidents (37.0%)
- 1,000–9,999 participants: 4 incidents (8.7%)
- More than one million participants: 1 incident (2.2%)
A total of 22 incidents involved at least 100 participants, accounting for 47.8% of all incidents. The Heilongjiang merchants’ shutdown involved more than one million participants and was the largest protest of the month. The Chongqing anti-animal-cruelty gathering, the employee protest at Wanwei Education in Xi’an, the wage protest by workers at Liansheng in Jiujiang, and the anti-waste-project march in Hefei each involved more than 1,000 participants.
5. Police Repression
Police present: 20 incidents, or approximately 43.5%
Clear incidents of violent repression or arrest: 10 incidents, or approximately 21.7% of all incidents
Among the 20 incidents in which police were present, 10 involved beatings, pepper spray, forcible dragging, arrests, or the removal of rights defenders. This means that repression or arrests occurred in half of all incidents attended by police.
Typical cases included the following: police in Xingtai, Hebei, used pepper spray against the family of a medical-malpractice victim seeking accountability; villagers in Taizhou, Zhejiang, opposing compulsory land expropriation were beaten by police; after a teenager drowned in Chongqing, family members and residents who marched in protest were suppressed by police; participants in the Chongqing anti-animal-cruelty gathering were arrested and placed under continuing surveillance; several Wuhan residents opposing a hazardous-waste laboratory were arrested; police raided a worship service at Chengdu’s Early Rain Covenant Church and took away several church members and children; hundreds of homeowners in Chengdu blocked a road, after which multiple people were beaten and arrested; the anti-waste-project march in Hefei briefly developed into clashes with police; homeowners in Chenzhou, Hunan, demanding property-ownership certificates were violently dragged away by police; and villagers in Shantou, Guangdong, were suppressed while occupying the village committee office and surrounding local officials.