集体抗争汇总
中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年6月）
中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年6月）
2026年6月，「昨天」项目共发布发生在中国的抗争事件46起。本月最受关注的是三起标志性事件：持续两个多月、波及逾百万商户的黑龙江“非暴力不合作”抗争运动，其规模为「昨天」项目建档以来最大；重庆爆发中国首次大规模反虐待动物集会，由网友与动物保护志愿者共同发起；安徽合肥逾千名居民集体上街，成功逼停一项大型垃圾中转站项目。此外，劳资纠纷、城管抢摊引发的冲突，以及浙江宁波“小洛熙”系列医疗事故维权事件持续发酵，构成本月抗争事件的另外三条主线。
一、抗争群体构成
各类工人与劳动者：11起（23.9%）
细分：制造工人（5起）、环卫工人（1起）、文职员工（1起）、超市员工（1起）、建筑工人（1起）、出租车司机（1起），以及被临时招募从事保安工作的学生（1起）。
业主及居民：6起（13.0%）
包括反对强拆、物业乱收费、旧物业拒绝离场、房产证无法办理、危险实验室及垃圾中转站项目等。
农民：4起（8.7%）
主要涉及强征土地，以及地方政府擅自改变村民户口性质、逃避集体土地权益分配等问题。
死者家属及相关维权者：5起（10.9%）
包括医疗事故、未成年人躲避渔政追赶溺亡，以及宁波“小洛熙”事件后续维权。
商户及参展商：4起（8.7%）
包括黑龙江百万商户集体罢市、广州商户牵马运货，以及深圳展会参展商连续维权。
摊贩及围观群众：4起（8.7%）
均与城管抢夺、查扣或拖走摊贩餐车有关。
动物保护人士及网友：2起（4.3%）
包括重庆数千人反虐待动物集会，以及浙江东阳女子抗议宠物猫被虐杀。
学生：2起（4.3%）
包括学生被所谓“强制扭转学校”人员带走，以及数百名高三学生突破校方阻拦、集体庆祝毕业。
访民：2起（4.3%）
包括访民在公安部门前唱歌控诉腐败，以及截访人员当街强行带走访民引发的反抗。
其他群体：6起（13.0%）
包括投保人、储户、乘客、基督教徒、网民及其他个体维权者。
二、地点分布情况
广东：12起
浙江：7起
四川、重庆：各4起
安徽、河北、湖南、贵州：各2起
黑龙江、湖北、海南、江西、陕西、山东、山西、甘肃、辽宁、北京：各1起
另有1起发生在公安部相关场所。
广东和浙江两地合计发生19起，占本月已发布事件总数的41.3%。广东事件主要集中在深圳、东莞、阳江、广州、清远、陆丰和汕头；浙江事件则主要集中在宁波，并涉及台州、杭州和东阳。
三、引发原因分布
欠薪、低薪及其他劳资纠纷：10起（21.7%）
具体包括：欠薪（5起）、工资过低（2起）、裁员不赔偿（1起）、克扣工资及赔偿不公（1起）、拖欠工资和社保并拒绝兑付员工集资款（1起）。
土地、住房及社区治理纠纷：9起（19.6%）
具体包括：强征土地（3起）、强拆（1起）、物业乱收费或拒绝退出（2起）、长期无法办理房产证（1起）、擅自改变村民户口性质以逃避土地权益分配（1起）、居民区附近建设危险实验室（1起）。
医疗事故及相关维权：5起（10.9%）
包括死者家属在医院讨说法遭警察镇压，以及宁波“小洛熙”家属和声援者被传唤、失联或施压等事件。
城管抢夺或查扣餐车：4起（8.7%）
成都、海口、宁波和阳江均发生摊贩站上餐车、阻止城管拖车的事件，其中多起吸引数百名群众围观声援。
虐待动物：2起（4.3%）
包括重庆大规模反虐待动物集会，以及浙江东阳宠物猫被虐杀后，主人在小区内公开抗议。
展会虚假宣传：2起（4.3%）
深圳一场跨境电商展被指采购商数量远低于宣传，甚至雇人冒充采购商，数百名参展商连续两天要求退费，部分愤怒商户随后砸毁展品。
环境及垃圾项目：2起（4.3%）
包括武汉居民反对危险废物实验室落户，以及合肥上千市民游行逼停大型垃圾中转项目。
其他原因：12起（26.1%）
包括政府乱检查、乱罚款，限制宗教信仰和悼念活动，保险退保纠纷，航空公司强制收费，存款被转为保险产品，限制商户运货工具，学生管理冲突、截访及执法追赶致人死亡等。
四、规模统计
1—9人：13起（28.3%）
10—99人：11起（23.9%）
100—999人：17起（37.0%）
1,000—9,999人：4起（8.7%）
百万人规模：1起（2.2%）
本月百人以上事件共22起，占全部事件的47.8%。其中，黑龙江商户罢市累计参与者超过百万人，是本月规模最大的抗争行动；重庆反虐待动物集会、西安万唯教育员工维权、九江联盛员工讨薪和合肥反垃圾项目游行的参与者均达到千人以上。
五、警察镇压情况
警察到场：20起，到场率约43.5%
明确发生暴力镇压或抓捕：10起，占全部事件约21.7%
在警察到场的20起事件中，有10起出现殴打、喷射辣椒水、强行拖拽、抓捕或带走维权者等情况，占警察到场事件的一半。
典型案例包括：河北邢台医疗事故死者家属讨说法遭警察喷射辣椒水；浙江台州村民反对强征土地遭警察殴打；重庆少年溺亡后，家属和民众游行遭警方镇压；重庆反虐待动物集会参与者遭抓捕和持续监控；武汉居民反对危险废物实验室落户，多人被抓；成都秋雨圣约教会礼拜遭警方冲击，多名教徒及儿童被带走；成都数百名业主堵路维权，多人被殴打抓捕；合肥反垃圾项目游行一度与警察发生冲突；湖南郴州业主索要房产证遭警察粗暴拖行；广东汕头村民占领村委、围堵干部期间遭到警方镇压。
Summary of Collective Protest Incidents in China
Published Cases Only — June 2026
In June 2026, the Yesterday Project published 46 collective protest incidents that occurred in China. Three landmark events drew the greatest attention during the month. The first was a nonviolent noncooperation movement in Heilongjiang that lasted for more than two months and involved over one million merchants, making it the largest protest documented by the Yesterday Project since its archive was established. The second was China’s first large-scale anti-animal-cruelty gathering, which broke out in Chongqing and was jointly initiated by netizens and animal-protection volunteers. The third took place in Hefei, Anhui, where more than 1,000 residents took to the streets and successfully forced the suspension of a large waste-transfer-station project.
In addition, labor disputes, clashes triggered by urban-management officers seizing vendors’ carts, and the continuing rights-defense campaign surrounding the medical-malpractice case of “Xiao Luoxi” in Ningbo, Zhejiang, formed three other major themes of protest during the month.
1. Composition of Protest Groups
Workers and other laborers: 11 incidents (23.9%)
Breakdown: factory workers, 5 incidents; sanitation workers, 1; office employees, 1; supermarket employees, 1; construction workers, 1; taxi drivers, 1; and students temporarily recruited to work as security guards, 1.
Homeowners and residents: 6 incidents (13.0%)
These included protests against forced demolitions, arbitrary property-management fees, former property-management companies refusing to leave residential compounds, the failure to issue property-ownership certificates, and proposed hazardous-laboratory and waste-transfer-station projects.
Farmers: 4 incidents (8.7%)
These mainly involved compulsory land expropriation and local authorities unilaterally changing villagers’ household-registration status in order to avoid distributing collective land rights and benefits.
Families of the deceased and related rights defenders: 5 incidents (10.9%)
These included medical-malpractice cases, the drowning of a minor while fleeing a fisheries-enforcement pursuit, and continuing rights-defense actions related to the “Xiao Luoxi” case in Ningbo.
Merchants and exhibitors: 4 incidents (8.7%)
These included the mass business shutdown involving more than one million merchants in Heilongjiang, a Guangzhou merchant using horses to transport goods, and two consecutive days of protests by exhibitors at a trade fair in Shenzhen.
Street vendors and onlookers: 4 incidents (8.7%)
All four incidents involved urban-management officers seizing, impounding, or towing away vendors’ food carts.
Animal-protection advocates and netizens: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included a gathering of several thousand people against animal cruelty in Chongqing and a protest by a woman in Dongyang, Zhejiang, after her pet cat was tortured and killed.
Students: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included a student being taken away by personnel from a so-called “compulsory correction school,” and several hundred graduating high-school students breaking through school restrictions to celebrate their graduation collectively.
Petitioners: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included petitioners singing outside a public-security agency to denounce corruption, and resistance triggered when interception personnel forcibly dragged away a petitioner in public.
Other groups: 6 incidents (13.0%)
These involved policyholders, bank depositors, airline passengers, Christians, netizens, and other individual rights defenders.
2. Geographic Distribution
- Guangdong: 12 incidents
- Zhejiang: 7 incidents
- Sichuan and Chongqing: 4 incidents each
- Anhui, Hebei, Hunan, and Guizhou: 2 incidents each
- Heilongjiang, Hubei, Hainan, Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Gansu, Liaoning, and Beijing: 1 incident each
- One additional incident occurred at a site connected to the Ministry of Public Security.
Guangdong and Zhejiang together accounted for 19 incidents, or 41.3% of all incidents published during the month. Incidents in Guangdong were mainly concentrated in Shenzhen, Dongguan, Yangjiang, Guangzhou, Qingyuan, Lufeng, and Shantou. Incidents in Zhejiang were concentrated mainly in Ningbo, with additional cases in Taizhou, Hangzhou, and Dongyang.
3. Distribution of Causes
Unpaid wages, low pay, and other labor disputes: 10 incidents (21.7%)
These included unpaid wages, 5 incidents; excessively low wages, 2; layoffs without compensation, 1; wage deductions and unfair compensation, 1; and unpaid wages and social-insurance contributions combined with refusal to repay employee investment funds, 1.
Land, housing, and community-governance disputes: 9 incidents (19.6%)
These included compulsory land expropriation, 3 incidents; forced demolition, 1; arbitrary property-management charges or refusal by former property managers to withdraw, 2; prolonged failure to issue property-ownership certificates, 1; unilateral changes to villagers’ household-registration status to avoid distributing land-related rights, 1; and the proposed construction of a hazardous laboratory near residential neighborhoods, 1.
Medical malpractice and related rights-defense actions: 5 incidents (10.9%)
These included families of deceased patients being suppressed by police while seeking accountability at hospitals, as well as incidents in which relatives and supporters connected to the “Xiao Luoxi” case in Ningbo were summoned, disappeared from public contact, or subjected to pressure.
Urban-management officers seizing or impounding food carts: 4 incidents (8.7%)
In Chengdu, Haikou, Ningbo, and Yangjiang, vendors climbed onto their food carts to prevent urban-management officers from towing them away. Several of these incidents attracted hundreds of onlookers who expressed support.
Animal cruelty: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included the large-scale anti-animal-cruelty gathering in Chongqing and a public protest inside a residential compound in Dongyang, Zhejiang, after a pet cat was tortured and killed.
False promotion by trade fairs: 2 incidents (4.3%)
A cross-border e-commerce exhibition in Shenzhen was accused of attracting far fewer buyers than advertised and even hiring people to pose as purchasers. Hundreds of exhibitors demanded refunds for two consecutive days, and some angry merchants later smashed exhibits.
Environmental and waste projects: 2 incidents (4.3%)
These included Wuhan residents opposing the establishment of a hazardous-waste laboratory and more than 1,000 Hefei residents marching to force the suspension of a large waste-transfer-station project.
Other causes: 12 incidents (26.1%)
These included arbitrary inspections and fines by government agencies, restrictions on religious practice and memorial activities, disputes over insurance-policy cancellation, compulsory airline charges, bank deposits being converted into insurance products, restrictions on merchants’ transport tools, conflicts over student management, interception of petitioners, and deaths caused by law-enforcement pursuits.
4. Scale of Incidents
- 1–9 participants: 13 incidents (28.3%)
- 10–99 participants: 11 incidents (23.9%)
- 100–999 participants: 17 incidents (37.0%)
- 1,000–9,999 participants: 4 incidents (8.7%)
- More than one million participants: 1 incident (2.2%)
A total of 22 incidents involved at least 100 participants, accounting for 47.8% of all incidents. The Heilongjiang merchants’ shutdown involved more than one million participants and was the largest protest of the month. The Chongqing anti-animal-cruelty gathering, the employee protest at Wanwei Education in Xi’an, the wage protest by workers at Liansheng in Jiujiang, and the anti-waste-project march in Hefei each involved more than 1,000 participants.
5. Police Repression
Police present: 20 incidents, or approximately 43.5%
Clear incidents of violent repression or arrest: 10 incidents, or approximately 21.7% of all incidents
Among the 20 incidents in which police were present, 10 involved beatings, pepper spray, forcible dragging, arrests, or the removal of rights defenders. This means that repression or arrests occurred in half of all incidents attended by police.
Typical cases included the following: police in Xingtai, Hebei, used pepper spray against the family of a medical-malpractice victim seeking accountability; villagers in Taizhou, Zhejiang, opposing compulsory land expropriation were beaten by police; after a teenager drowned in Chongqing, family members and residents who marched in protest were suppressed by police; participants in the Chongqing anti-animal-cruelty gathering were arrested and placed under continuing surveillance; several Wuhan residents opposing a hazardous-waste laboratory were arrested; police raided a worship service at Chengdu’s Early Rain Covenant Church and took away several church members and children; hundreds of homeowners in Chengdu blocked a road, after which multiple people were beaten and arrested; the anti-waste-project march in Hefei briefly developed into clashes with police; homeowners in Chenzhou, Hunan, demanding property-ownership certificates were violently dragged away by police; and villagers in Shantou, Guangdong, were suppressed while occupying the village committee office and surrounding local officials.
中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年5月）
「中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年5月）」2026年5月份，「昨天」项目共发布了发生在中国的抗争事件 59 起。本月劳动者维权行动仍占据重要比重，劳动节前后欠薪讨薪事件密集爆发；与此同时，城管、交警收车抢摊引发的冲突、学生集会抗议及强拆亦显著增多。值得注意的是，在本月三起较大规模的事件中，抗争者均取得了胜利，分别是：鲁甸安置房业主抗议社区收停车费；四川乐山业主抗议买房后未获城市户口；汶上学生抗议学校延迟放学时间。
一、 抗争群体构成
各类工人与劳动者：18 起（30.5%）
细分：制造工人（10起）、文职员工（4起）、货运司机（1起）、演员（1起）、医护人员（1起）、教师（1起）
学生及学生家长：7 起（11.9%）
业主及拆迁安置房业主：5 起（8.5%）—— 含强拆、烂尾楼、户口承诺违约
农民：4 起（6.8%）
死者家属：4 起（6.8%）—— 含单独出现（3起）及与网民联合维权（1起）
网民：3 起（5.1%）
其他群体：18 起（30.5%）—— 包含访民、商户、车主、投资人、储户、商贩、摊贩、社保购买者、自来水用户、企业主、患者等
二、 地点分布情况
浙江：6 起
广西 / 湖南：各 5 起
江苏 / 四川 / 广东：各 4 起
云南 / 上海 / 陕西 / 河北：各 3 起
山西 / 山东 / 重庆 / 海南 / 福建 / 湖北：各 2 起
其他地区（宁夏、青海、北京、河南、辽宁、国家信访局、中国社交媒体）：各 1 起
三、 引发原因分布
欠薪及劳资纠纷：17 起（28.8%）
具体包括：欠薪（7起）、欠缴公积金/社保（2起）、降薪（1起）、克扣工资（1起）、克扣退卡费（1起）、搬厂不赔偿（1起）、工伤中毒不赔偿（1起）、变相裁员（1起）、资金不赔偿（1起）、收购后赔偿方案不公（1起）
强拆及房产纠纷：6 起（10.2%）—— 含强拆（4起）、烂尾（2起）
城管、交警抢摊和收车引发的反抗：3 起（5.1%）
医疗事故及健康权益：3 起（5.1%）
学生权益（停电、校规、食品安全、虐待）：4 起（6.8%）
金融诈骗：3 起（5.1%）
其他原因：23 起（39.0%）—— 包含环境污染、强制精神病收治（被精神病）、政府违背户口转城市承诺、交警执法冲突、自来水污染、校园霸凌、无选举权等
四、 规模统计
1 – 9 人：14 起
10 – 99 人：15 起
100 – 999 人：23 起
1,000 – 9,999 人：7 起
五、 警察镇压情况
警察到场：29 起（到场率约 49.2%）
明确发生镇压 / 抓捕：10 起（比例约 16.9%）
典型案例：广东广州泛华保险投资人连日集会多人遭抓捕；上海社保维权者被强行塞入大巴带走；上海高院外外滩190街坊被强拆户遭保安暴力驱逐；广西平南村民抗议采石场破坏环境遭特警镇压打伤；
“Summary of Collective Resistance Events in China (Published Records) — May 2026”
In May 2026, the Yesterday project documented 59 collective resistance events occurring across China. Labor rights actions again made up a significant share of the month’s incidents, with a cluster of wage-related protests erupting around International Workers’ Day. Also notable were a rise in clashes triggered by urban management (chengguan) and traffic police confiscating stalls and vehicles, as well as increases in student demonstrations and forced demolitions. Worth highlighting: in three of the month’s larger-scale events, protesters won. These were the Ludian resettlement-estate residents who pushed back against parking fees imposed by their community management; the Leshan, Sichuan homeowners who protested the government’s failure to transfer their household registration (hukou) after they purchased homes; and the students in Wenshang, Shandong who challenged their school’s policy of keeping them late.
I. Breakdown by Protesting Group
Workers and laborers of all types: 18 incidents (30.5%)
- Breakdown: manufacturing workers (10), office and white-collar workers (4), freight drivers (1), performers/actors (1), healthcare workers (1), teachers (1)
Students and parents of students: 7 incidents (11.9%)
Homeowners and resettlement-housing residents: 5 incidents (8.5%) — including forced demolitions, stalled/abandoned housing projects, and broken government promises on household registration (hukou) transfers
Farmers/rural residents: 4 incidents (6.8%)
Bereaved family members: 4 incidents (6.8%) — including those acting alone (3) and jointly with netizens (1)
Netizens: 3 incidents (5.1%)
Other groups: 18 incidents (30.5%) — including petitioners, shop owners, vehicle owners, investors, bank depositors, street vendors, stallholders, social insurance contributors, tap water users, business owners, and patients
II. Geographic Distribution
Zhejiang: 6 incidents
Guangxi / Hunan: 5 incidents each
Jiangsu / Sichuan / Guangdong: 4 incidents each
Yunnan / Shanghai / Shaanxi / Hebei: 3 incidents each
Shanxi / Shandong / Chongqing / Hainan / Fujian / Hubei: 2 incidents each
Other regions (Ningxia, Qinghai, Beijing, Henan, Liaoning, the State Bureau for Letters and Calls, Chinese social media): 1 incident each
III. Causes of Protest
Wage arrears and labor disputes: 17 incidents (28.8%)
- Specifically: unpaid wages (7), failure to pay housing provident fund/social insurance contributions (2), pay cuts (1), wage clawbacks (1), refusal to refund prepaid card balances (1), factory relocation without compensation (1), refusal to compensate for occupational poisoning (1), disguised layoffs (1), failure to pay severance (1), disputed post-acquisition compensation (1)
Forced demolition and housing disputes: 6 incidents (10.2%) — including forced demolitions (4) and stalled/abandoned housing projects (2)
Resistance triggered by chengguan and traffic police confiscating stalls and vehicles: 3 incidents (5.1%)
Medical malpractice and health rights: 3 incidents (5.1%)
Student rights (power outages, school rules, food safety, abuse): 4 incidents (6.8%)
Financial fraud: 3 incidents (5.1%)
Other causes: 23 incidents (39.0%) — including environmental damage, forced psychiatric institutionalization (被精神病), government violations of hukou transfer commitments, traffic enforcement clashes, tap water contamination, school bullying, and demands for electoral rights
IV. Scale of Events
1 – 9 participants: 14 incidents
10 – 99 participants: 15 incidents
100 – 999 participants: 23 incidents
1,000 – 9,999 participants: 7 incidents
V. Police Repression
Police presence confirmed: 29 incidents (approximately 49.2%)
Confirmed use of force or arrests: 10 incidents (approximately 16.9%)
Notable cases: multiple investors arrested after consecutive days of rallying outside Pan-China Insurance in Guangzhou; social insurance petitioners in Shanghai forcibly loaded onto buses and removed; displaced residents from Waitan Block 190 violently ejected by security guards outside Shanghai’s High Court; villagers in Pingnan, Guangxi beaten by riot police after protesting environmental damage caused by a quarry.
「中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年4月）」
「中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年4月）」2026年4月份，「昨天」项目共发布了发生在中国的抗争事件 74 起。本月劳动者维权行动占据了很大比例，尤其在欠薪、派送单价下调及退休保障方面。
一、 抗争群体构成 (总 74 起)
各类工人与劳动者：26 起 (35.1%) —— 本月核心力量
细分：制造工人 (8起)、交通运输（司机/骑手 7起）、教育/职员（教师/幼师 7起）、医护/环卫/服务员 (4起)
死者家属： 6 起 (8.1%)
农民： 6 起 (8.1%)
访民： 4 起 (5.4%)
业主： 4 起 (5.4%)
其他群体： 28 起 (37.9%) —— 包含商贩、学生、退伍军人、储户及网民等。
二、 地点分布情况 (主要省份)
广西 / 湖北 / 河北 / 广东： 各 6 起
北京 / 重庆 / 浙江 / 河南： 各 4 起
湖南 / 四川 / 山东 / 辽宁 / 黑龙江 / 江苏 / 福建： 各 3 起
其他地区： 共 11 起
三、 引发原因分布
劳资纠纷与社会保障：22 起 (29.7%) —— 绝大多数工人抗争的主因
具体包括：欠薪、拖欠退休金、无养老保障、裁员/搬厂未赔偿、压低派送单价、克扣工资等。
滥用公权力（城管/交警）： 6 起 (8.1%) —— 包含没收外卖骑手电动车引发的矛盾。
强征与强拆： 6 起 (8.1%)
医疗/教育责任事故： 4 起 (5.4%)
其他原因： 36 起 (48.7%) —— 包含截访、烂尾楼、环境破坏、金融诈骗及言论限制。
四、 规模统计
1 – 9人： 25 起
10 – 99人： 21 起
100 – 999人： 25 起 (包含重庆外卖员罢工、多地工人集体讨薪)
1,000 – 9,999人： 3 起
五、 警察镇压情况
警察到场： 22 起 (到场率约 29.7%)
明确发生镇压/抓捕： 6 起 (比例约 8.1%)
“Summary of Collective Resistance Events in China (Published Records) — April 2026”
In April 2026, the Yesterday project documented 74 collective resistance events occurring across China. Labor rights actions made up a significant share of this month’s incidents, particularly around wage arrears, cuts to delivery rates, and retirement security.
I. Breakdown by Protesting Group (total: 74)
- Workers and laborers of all types: 26 incidents (35.1%) — the month’s core force
- Breakdown: manufacturing workers (8), transportation workers — drivers/delivery riders (7), education/office workers — teachers/kindergarten teachers (7), healthcare workers/sanitation workers/service staff (4)
- Bereaved family members: 6 incidents (8.1%)
- Farmers/rural residents: 6 incidents (8.1%)
- Petitioners: 4 incidents (5.4%)
- Homeowners/residents: 4 incidents (5.4%)
- Other groups: 28 incidents (37.9%) — including street vendors, students, veterans, depositors, and netizens
II. Geographic Distribution (major provinces)
- Guangxi / Hubei / Hebei / Guangdong: 6 incidents each
- Beijing / Chongqing / Zhejiang / Henan: 4 incidents each
- Hunan / Sichuan / Shandong / Liaoning / Heilongjiang / Jiangsu / Fujian: 3 incidents each
- Other regions: 11 incidents
III. Causes of Protest
- Labor disputes and social security: 22 incidents (29.7%) — the primary driver of most worker actions
- Including: wage arrears, withheld pension payments, lack of retirement coverage, layoffs/factory relocations without compensation, cuts to delivery rates, wage deductions, etc.
- Abuse of administrative authority (urban management officers/traffic police): 6 incidents (8.1%) — including seizure of delivery riders’ electric vehicles
- Forced requisition and forced demolition: 6 incidents (8.1%)
- Medical/educational negligence: 4 incidents (5.4%)
- Other causes: 36 incidents (48.7%) — including petition interception, stalled housing projects, environmental damage, financial fraud, and restrictions on free expression
IV. Scale of Incidents
- 1–9 participants: 25 incidents
- 10–99 participants: 21 incidents
- 100–999 participants: 25 incidents (including the Chongqing delivery riders’ strike and collective wage-recovery actions in multiple cities)
- 1,000–9,999 participants: 3 incidents
V. Police Repression
- Police presence confirmed: 22 incidents (presence rate approx. 29.7%)
- Confirmed repression or arrests: 6 incidents (approx. 8.1%)
中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年3月）
中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年3月）
2026年3月份，「昨天」项目共发布了发生在中国的抗争事件 76 起。本月的焦点分别在广东陆丰、信宜以及湖北武汉。在广东陆丰，逾万名市民联合走上街头，抵制当局颁布的”禁炮令”；在广东信宜，勇敢的村民为抵制紧邻村庄的火葬场建设项目，连续多日发起抗议，两度与警察爆发冲突。在湖北武汉江夏区，数百市民为了抵制污染工厂，多次走上街头，在不远处的左岭新城，上千居民一夜之间拆掉6个小区的收费栏杆，迫使物业放弃了收费。
一、 抗争群体构成 (总 76 起)
- 农民：16 起 (21.1%) —— 本月核心群体
- 业主：10 起 (13.2%)
- 制造工人：9 起 (11.8%)
- 访民：6 起 (7.9%)
- 死者家属：6 起 (7.9%)
- 投资人：4 起 (5.3%)
- 信徒/民俗参与者：3 起 (3.9%) —— 陆丰、信宜案例
- 商贩：5 起 (6.6%)
- 其他群体：17 起 (22.4%) —— 包含：学生家长、环卫、司机、教师、储户等
二、 地点分布情况 (主要省份)
- 广东：16 起 (涵盖陆丰、信宜、深圳、广州等)
- 北京：7 起 (多为信访局周边)
- 四川：6 起
- 江苏：6 起
- 河北：6 起
- 海南：5 起
- 福建：4 起
- 湖北：4 起 (全部发生在武汉)
- 云南 / 陕西 / 内蒙古：各 3 起
- 其他地区：共 13 起 (涉及山西、河南、江西、山东等)
三、 引发原因分布
- 强拆与强征：12 起 (15.8%)
- 劳资冲突/欠薪：8 起 (10.5%)
- 环境污染与侵害：5 起 (6.6%) —— 火葬场、电池厂
- 企业关厂/搬厂未赔偿：6 起 (7.9%)
- 医疗事故：5 起 (6.6%)
- 投资诈骗：4 起 (5.3%)
- 民俗/宗教限制：4 起 (5.3%) —— 禁炮令等
- 乱收费：4 起 (5.3%)
- 城管冲突：3 起 (3.9%)
- 其他原因：25 起 (32.9%) —— 包含烂尾楼、警察暴力、食品安全、选举舞弊等
四、 规模大小统计
- 1 – 9人：12 起
- 10 – 99人：33 起
- 100 – 999人：25 起
- 1,000 – 9,999人：5 起
- 10,000人以上：1 起 (陆丰万人抗议)
五、 警察镇压情况
- 警察到场：37 起 (到场率约 48.7%)
- 明确发生镇压/抓捕：15 起 (镇压比例约 19.7%)
- 暴力焦点：主要发生于广东信宜（火葬场抗议）、陆丰（禁炮令）、湖北武汉（环境抗议）以及多地强拆现场。
Summary of Mass Resistance Events in China (Published Partial Data) – March 2026
In March 2026, the “Yesterday” Project published a total of 76 resistance events that occurred across China. This month’s focal points were Lufeng and Xinyi in Guangdong Province, and Wuhan in Hubei Province. In Lufeng, over 10,000 citizens took to the streets to protest the authorities’ “firecracker ban.” In Xinyi, courageous villagers launched multi-day protests against the construction of a crematorium adjacent to their village, resulting in two violent clashes with police. In the Jiangxia District of Wuhan, hundreds of citizens repeatedly marched against polluting factories; meanwhile, in nearby Zuoling New Town, thousands of residents tore down toll gates across six residential compounds overnight, forcing property management to abandon the fees.
I. Composition of Protesting Groups (Total: 76)
- Farmers: 16 cases (21.1%) —— The core group this month
- Property Owners: 10 cases (13.2%)
- Manufacturing Workers: 9 cases (11.8%)
- Petitioners: 6 cases (7.9%)
- Families of the Deceased/Patients: 6 cases (7.9%)
- Investors: 4 cases (5.3%)
- Believers/Folk Custom Participants: 3 cases (3.9%) —— Lufeng and Xinyi cases
- Vendors: 5 cases (6.6%)
- Other Groups: 17 cases (22.4%) —— Including parents, sanitation workers, drivers, teachers, depositors, etc.
II. Geographic Distribution (Major Provinces)
- Guangdong: 16 cases (Lufeng, Xinyi, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc.)
- Beijing: 7 cases (Mostly near the Letters and Visits Bureau)
- Sichuan: 6 cases
- Jiangsu: 6 cases
- Hebei: 6 cases
- Hainan: 5 cases
- Fujian: 4 cases
- Hubei: 4 cases (All occurred in Wuhan)
- Yunnan / Shaanxi / Inner Mongolia: 3 cases each
- Other Regions: 13 cases total (Shanxi, Henan, Jiangxi, Shandong, etc.)
III. Distribution of Root Causes
- Forced Demolition & Land Requisition: 12 cases (15.8%)
- Labor Disputes/Unpaid Wages: 8 cases (10.5%)
- Environmental Pollution & Infringement: 5 cases (6.6%) —— Crematoriums, battery factories
- Factory Closures/Relocation without Compensation: 6 cases (7.9%)
- Medical Malpractice: 5 cases (6.6%)
- Investment Fraud: 4 cases (5.3%)
- Folk Custom/Religious Restrictions: 4 cases (5.3%) —— Firecracker bans, etc.
- Arbitrary Fees: 4 cases (5.3%)
- Conflicts with Chengguan (Urban Management): 3 cases (3.9%)
- Other Causes: 25 cases (32.9%) —— Unfinished buildings (Lanweilou), police brutality, food safety, election fraud, etc.
IV. Statistics by Scale of Event
- 1 – 9 people: 12 cases
- 10 – 99 people: 33 cases
- 100 – 999 people: 25 cases
- 1,000 – 9,999 people: 5 cases
- 10,000+ people: 1 case (Lufeng mass protest)
V. Police Suppression Status
- Police Presence: 37 cases (Approx. 48.7% presence rate)
- Confirmed Suppression/Arrests: 15 cases (Approx. 19.7% suppression rate)
- Hotspots of Violence: Primarily occurred in Xinyi, Guangdong (crematorium protests), Lufeng (firecracker ban), Wuhan, Hubei (environmental protests), and various forced demolition sites nationwide.
《2026年第一季度城管暴力事件记录》 时间： 2026年1-3月】
《2026年第一季度城管暴力事件记录》 时间： 2026年1-3月 地点：中国
Record of Urban Management Enforcement Violence (Q1 2026)
Time: January–March 2026 Location: China
中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年2月）
2026年2月份，共发布了发生在中国的群体抗争事件 43 起。由于该月是中国的农历新年月，群体抗争事件相对平时有所下降。
一、 抗争群体
- 工人群体（18起，占 42%）
- 构成：建筑工人(8起)、制造工人(8起)、环卫工人(2起)。
- 核心诉求：全部围绕劳资冲突（讨要欠薪、抗议降薪、调休安排不合理、企业搬迁拒不赔偿等）。
- 死者/患者家属（6起，占 14%）
- 严重医疗事故索赔、学生遭霸凌自杀求真相、员工聚餐酒后摔倒身亡求说法、工人自杀及反强制火化（抢尸冲突）等。
- 农民群体（5起，占 12%）
- 反抗强拆、抗议水泥厂污染环境、抗议村委私自出租集体学校、讨要被拖欠的征地补偿款等。
- 信徒群体（4起，占 9%）
- 抗议传统民俗/游神活动被禁、抗议当局强拆妈祖像及强拆祠堂。
- 投资者群体（2起，占 5%）
- 主要针对投资理财诈骗。
- 其他群体（8起，占 18%）
- 访民(2起)、学生(1起)、企业消防员(1起)、民代幼老师(1起)、退伍老兵(1起)、拆迁户(1起)、渔民(1起)。
二、 地点分布情况
- 广东 8起（深圳2起，中山、珠海、阳江、廉江、汕头、东莞各1起）；
- 陕西 7起（西安4起、咸阳3起）；
- 江苏 3起（全部发生在扬州高邮）；
- 河北 3起、山东 3起；
- 湖南(2起)、浙江(2起)、海南(2起)、云南(2起)、贵州(2起)、北京(2起)；
- 其他各1起（共7省市：上海、福建、新疆、重庆、吉林、辽宁、江西）。
三、 引发原因
- 工人讨薪与劳资冲突（19起，占 44%）：企业欠薪、降薪、消防员被裁员不赔偿、公司搬迁不赔偿、春节假期调休安排不合理等。
- 公权力与民生冲突（13起，占 30%）：强拆民房/祠堂/寺庙及渔排、拖欠拆迁和征地补偿款、民俗及游神活动被禁、退伍安置不公、政府抢尸强制火化、水泥厂污染环境等。
- 社会底线及信任危机（7起，占 16%）：医疗事故致死、学生遭老师霸凌自杀、工人跳楼自杀及员工聚餐意外身亡讨说法，以及民代幼老师老无所养、学校限制人身自由引发学生“起义”等。
- 金融与投资诈骗（2起，占 5%）：投资平台诈骗导致投资者集体上访维权等。
- 上访维权受阻（2起，占 5%）：访民在火车站等地遭到胶带绑架等暴力截访。
四、 规模大小统计
- 1-9人：3 起（占 7%）
- 10-99人：32 起（占 74%）
- 100-999人：8 起（占 19%）。（包括：山东德州学生怒砸校舍起义、广东中山环卫工人罢工、新疆合盛硅业工人罢工、西安比亚迪工人罢工、西安信徒对峙、山东菏泽裕罗电器工人罢工、湖南邵阳农民堵路、河北唐山农民占领镇政府）
五、 出动警察及暴力镇压情况
- 警察到场率：约 63%（共27起事件有警察出动）。
- 暴力驱散或抓捕：有 10起 事件明确发生了警察施暴、殴打、捆绑或抓捕维权者（占总事件的23%）。
- 镇压特征：警察的暴力抓捕行动主要集中在“讨薪维权”、“家属讨说法”和“涉及土地/强拆的维权”中（例如：东莞警察将讨薪工人拴起、威海芜湖船厂警察暴力驱逐讨薪工人、吉安樟山镇暴力阻挠建祠堂、云南富源警察进村抢尸爆发冲突等）。
（注：由于高邮是三个独立的工厂工人讨薪，所以算为三起。）
Summary of Mass Protests in China (Published Cases) (February 2026)
In February 2026, a total of 43 mass protest events were recorded in China. Due to the Lunar New Year falling in this month, the number of mass protests saw a relative decline compared to usual.
I. Protesting Groups
- Workers (18 incidents, 42%)
- Composition: Construction workers (8), manufacturing workers (8), sanitation workers (2).
- Core demands: All centered around labor-capital conflicts (demanding unpaid wages, protesting pay cuts, unreasonable shift/leave arrangements, company relocation evading compensation, etc.).
- Families of the Deceased/Patients (6 incidents, 14%)
- Seeking compensation for severe medical malpractice, seeking truth for a student’s suicide due to bullying, demanding accountability for an employee’s accidental death after a company drinking gathering, worker suicides, and resisting forced cremation (corpse-snatching conflicts), etc.
- Farmers (5 incidents, 12%)
- Resisting forced demolition, protesting environmental pollution by a cement plant, protesting the village committee’s unauthorized leasing of a collective school, demanding long-overdue land requisition compensation, etc.
- Religious Believers (4 incidents, 9%)
- Protesting the ban on traditional folk/deity-parading (Youshen) activities, protesting the authorities’ forced demolition of Mazu statues and ancestral halls.
- Investors (2 incidents, 5%)
- Mainly targeting financial investment fraud.
- Other Groups (8 incidents, 18%)
- Petitioners (2), students (1), corporate firefighters (1), community/substitute teachers (Min-Dai-You teachers) (1), military veterans (1), evictees (1), fishermen (1).
II. Location Distribution
- Guangdong: 8 incidents (Shenzhen 2; Zhongshan, Zhuhai, Yangjiang, Lianjiang, Shantou, and Dongguan 1 each);
- Shaanxi: 7 incidents (Xi’an 4, Xianyang 3);
- Jiangsu: 3 incidents (all occurred in Gaoyou, Yangzhou);
- Hebei: 3 incidents; Shandong: 3 incidents;
- Hunan (2), Zhejiang (2), Hainan (2), Yunnan (2), Guizhou (2), Beijing (2);
- 1 incident each in 7 other provinces/municipalities (Shanghai, Fujian, Xinjiang, Chongqing, Jilin, Liaoning, Jiangxi).
III. Triggers and Causes
- Worker Wage Arrears and Labor Conflicts (19 incidents, 44%): Unpaid wages, pay cuts, laid-off firefighters denied compensation, uncompensated company relocations, unreasonable Spring Festival leave arrangements, etc.
- Conflicts between Public Power and Livelihood (13 incidents, 30%): Forced demolition of civilian homes/ancestral halls/temples and fishing rafts, defaulted demolition and land requisition compensation, bans on folk and deity-parading activities, unfair veteran resettlement, government corpse-snatching for forced cremation, cement plant pollution, etc.
- Social Bottom Line and Trust Crises (7 incidents, 16%): Fatal medical malpractice, student suicide due to teacher bullying, worker jumping to death, demanding accountability for an employee’s accidental death at a gathering, lack of pension for community/substitute teachers, and a student “uprising” triggered by a school restricting personal freedom, etc.
- Financial and Investment Fraud (2 incidents, 5%): Investment platform scams leading to collective petitioning by investors.
- Blocked Petitioning/Rights Defense (2 incidents, 5%): Petitioners being violently intercepted, such as being bound with duct tape at train stations.
IV. Scale and Size Statistics
- 1-9 people: 3 incidents (7%)
- 10-99 people: 32 incidents (74%)
- 100-999 people: 8 incidents (19%). (Including: Uprising by students smashing school buildings in Dezhou, Shandong; strike by sanitation workers in Zhongshan, Guangdong; strike by workers at Hoshine Silicon in Xinjiang; strike by BYD workers in Xi’an; standoff by religious believers in Xi’an; strike by workers at Yura Corporation in Heze, Shandong; farmers blocking roads in Shaoyang, Hunan; farmers occupying the town government in Tangshan, Hebei).
V. Police Deployment and Violent Suppression
- Police Presence Rate: Approx. 63% (police were deployed in 27 incidents).
- Violent Dispersal or Arrests: In 10 incidents, clear violence, beatings, binding, or arrests of protesters by police occurred (accounting for 23% of total incidents).
- Suppression Characteristics: Violent police arrests were mainly concentrated in “wage-demand protests,” “families demanding accountability,” and “land/forced demolition protests” (e.g., police in Dongguan tying up wage-demanding workers; police violently expelling wage-demanding workers at Wuhu Shipyard in Weihai; violent obstruction of ancestral hall construction in Zhangshan Town, Ji’an; clashes triggered by police entering a village to snatch a corpse in Fuyuan, Yunnan).
(Note: Because the Gaoyou event involved workers from three independent factories demanding unpaid wages, it is counted as three incidents.)
中国群体抗争事件汇总（已发布部分）（2026年1月）
2026年1月份，昨天频道共发布了发生在中国的群体抗争事件50起。
一、 抗争群体
- 工人群体（17起，占 34%）
- 构成：建筑工人(9起)、制造工人(4起)、物业保洁(2起)、环卫工人(1起)、煤矿工人(1起)。
- 核心诉求：全部围绕劳资冲突（讨要欠薪、抗议降薪、企业秘密搬迁逃避赔偿等）。
- 业主群体（7起，占 14%）
- 烂尾楼盘要房、抗议开发商虚假宣传、抵制物业乱收停车费等。
- 投资者群体（7起，占 14%）
- 主要针对金融理财诈骗跑路、黄金珠宝暴雷（如深圳水贝事件）。
- 农民群体（6起，占 12%）
- 反抗政府/村霸强征强占土地、讨要被拖欠多年的巨额粮款、反强制火葬。
- 死者/患者家属（5起，占 10%）
- 校园离奇死亡、霸凌致死事件求真相，以及严重医疗事故索赔。
- 其他群体（8起，占 16%）
- 学生(2起)、摊贩(2起)、网民(1起)、信徒(1起)、储户(1起)、民代幼教师(1起)。
二、 地点分布情况
广东 8起（全部集中在深圳，由珠宝暴雷和劳工罢工主导）；
河南 5起（驻马店、郑州）。
湖南 (4起)、福建 (4起)、四川 (3起)、安徽 (3起)、海南 (3起)、云南 (3起)。
重庆、山西、广西、浙江、山东、内蒙古（各2起）；上海、天津、湖北、陕西、黑龙江（各1起）。
三、 引发原因：
工人讨薪与劳资冲突（17起，占 34%）：企业欠薪跑路、降薪、关厂/搬迁不赔偿、强行垄断工人饮食等。
公权力与民生冲突（9起，占 18%）：城管暴力没收摊贩设备、政府/村霸强征强占土地、拖欠农户千万粮款、强拆村民自筹寺庙、强推火葬政策等。
房产乱象与烂尾楼（8起，占 16%）：农民安置房/商品房烂尾、开发商虚假宣传、物业乱收费及违规乱建等。
社会底线及信任危机（8起，占 16%）：学校隐瞒学生死亡真相、校园霸凌致死、医院严重误诊拒不担责、学校违规取消假期强制留校等。
金融与投资暴雷（7起，占 14%）：民间理财违约跑路、深圳水贝黄金珠宝平台百亿级暴雷诈骗等。
银行储户维权（1起，占 2%）：邮储银行网点欺诈储户“存款变保险”。
四、 规模大小统计
- 1-9人：6 起（占 12%）
- 10-99人：28 起（占 56%）
- 100-999人：11 起（占 22%）
- （1000-9999人）：5 起（占 10%）。(包括：天津美克家居千人罢工、云南数千农民反强制火葬、宁波上千网民集会、广西贵港千名学生冲校、深圳千名投资者抗议)
五、出动警察及暴力镇压情况
- 警察到场率：高达 68%（共34起事件有警察出动）。
- 暴力驱散或抓捕：有 17起 事件明确发生了警察施暴、殴打或抓捕维权者（占总事件的34%）。
- 镇压特征：警察的暴力抓捕行动高度集中在“投资者/业主维权”和“农民涉地维权”中（例如深圳水贝冲突、湖南长沙业主堵路、内蒙古农民集会）。
注：同一事件如果发生在两个不同的日期里，算两起。
以下是为您翻译的英文版本：
In January 2026, the “Yesterday” channel published a total of 50 group protest incidents that occurred in China.
I. Protest Groups
- Workers (17 incidents, 34%)
- Composition: Construction workers (9 incidents), manufacturing workers (4), property cleaners (2), sanitation workers (1), state-owned coal mine workers (1).
- Core demands: All revolved around labor conflicts (demanding unpaid wages, protesting pay cuts, secret factory relocations to evade compensation, etc.).
- Homeowners (7 incidents, 14%)
- Demanding homes from unfinished (rotten-tail) housing projects, protesting developers’ false advertising, and boycotting arbitrary parking fees charged by property management.
- Investors (7 incidents, 14%)
- Primarily targeting financial wealth management fraud/absconding, and the collapse of gold and jewelry platforms (such as the Shenzhen Shuibei incident).
- Farmers (6 incidents, 12%)
- Resisting forced land requisition and occupation by the government or village bullies, demanding massive grain payments in arrears for years, and opposing forced cremations.
- Families of the Deceased/Patients (5 incidents, 10%)
- Seeking the truth behind bizarre campus deaths and fatal bullying incidents, as well as demanding compensation for severe medical malpractice.
- Other Groups (8 incidents, 16%)
- Students (2), street vendors (2), netizens (1), religious believers (1), bank depositors (1), and community/substitute/kindergarten teachers (1).
II. Geographic Distribution
- Guangdong: 8 incidents (all concentrated in Shenzhen, dominated by the jewelry platform collapse and labor strikes);
- Henan: 5 incidents (Zhumadian, Zhengzhou);
- Hunan (4), Fujian (4), Sichuan (3), Anhui (3), Hainan (3), Yunnan (3);
- Chongqing, Shanxi, Guangxi, Zhejiang, Shandong, Inner Mongolia (2 incidents each); Shanghai, Tianjin, Hubei, Shaanxi, Heilongjiang (1 incident each).
III. Causes of Incidents
- Worker Unpaid Wages and Labor Conflicts (17 incidents, 34%): Enterprises absconding with unpaid wages, pay cuts, uncompensated factory closures/relocations, forced monopolies on workers’ food, etc.
- Public Power and Livelihood Conflicts (9 incidents, 18%): Chengguan (urban management) violently confiscating vendors’ equipment, government/village bullies forcibly requisitioning and occupying land, owing farmers tens of millions in grain payments, forced demolition of self-funded village temples, and the forced implementation of cremation policies.
- Real Estate Chaos and Unfinished Buildings (8 incidents, 16%): Unfinished farmer resettlement housing and commercial housing, developers’ false advertising, arbitrary property fees, and illegal constructions.
- Social Bottom-Line and Trust Crisis (8 incidents, 16%): Schools covering up the truth of student deaths, fatal campus bullying, hospitals’ severe misdiagnoses and refusal to take responsibility, schools illegally canceling holidays and forcing students to stay on campus.
- Financial and Investment Collapse (7 incidents, 14%): Default and absconding in private wealth management, the multi-billion yuan fraud collapse of the Shenzhen Shuibei gold and jewelry platform, etc.
- Bank Depositors’ Rights Defense (1 incident, 2%): Postal Savings Bank branches defrauding depositors by converting “deposits into insurance.”
IV. Scale of Protests
- 1-9 people: 6 incidents (12%)
- 10-99 people: 28 incidents (56%)
- 100-999 people: 11 incidents (22%)
- 1,000-9,999 people: 5 incidents (10%). (Including: the strike of thousands of workers at Markor Home Furnishings in Tianjin, thousands of farmers protesting forced cremation in Yunnan, a gathering of over a thousand netizens in Ningbo, a thousand students charging out of the school gates in Guigang, Guangxi, and protests by thousands of investors in Shenzhen).
V. Police Deployment and Violent Suppression
- Police Presence Rate: As high as 68% (Police were deployed to maintain stability in a total of 34 incidents).
- Violent Dispersal or Arrests: In 17 incidents, police explicitly used violence, beatings, or arrested rights defenders (accounting for 34% of total incidents).
- Characteristics of Suppression/Stability Maintenance: Violent police arrests were highly concentrated in “Investor/Homeowner Rights Defense” and “Farmer Land-Related Rights Defense” (e.g., the Shenzhen Shuibei conflicts, Changsha homeowners blocking roads in Hunan, and farmer gatherings in Inner Mongolia). In contrast, in incidents solely involving construction workers demanding unpaid wages, although police frequently arrived to maintain order, they rarely directly arrested the protesting workers.
(Note: If the same event occurred on two different dates, it is counted as two separate incidents.)
33天22起，经济下行与“强制社保”双重压力下的制造业工人罢工潮
「33天22起，经济下行与“强制社保”双重压力下的制造业工人罢工潮」在过去的一个多月里，中国制造业掀起了一波接连不断的工人罢工潮。工厂车间、流水线和工业园区，频繁上演着工人集体停工、维权的场景。罢工潮的背后，是经济下行导致订单锐减、企业经营成本骤增，以及“强制社保”政策落地给中小企业带来的巨大压力，这些压力，在近期已经导致大量企业倒闭，仅在我们统计的这22起涉及到工人维权的案例中，就有九家工厂已经宣布倒闭，其余也面临巨大的经营压力。然而，承担后果的不止是企业，还有最普通的劳动者——他们被迫面临企业将风险与成本层层转嫁后带来的降薪、欠薪、裁员不赔偿，搬迁不赔偿等种种不公。
据昨天频道统计，仅在2025年8月1日至9月2日的33天里，中国各地便发生了22起制造业工人集体维权行动，涉及医药、纺织、航天、包装、汽车零配件和半导体等多个行业。这些事件不仅凸显了劳资矛盾的加剧，也折射出中国制造业工人目前所处的脆弱境地。这22起制造业工人罢工事件分别是：
8月1日，因工资过低，每月仅1500元，湖南永州道县锋源鞋厂工人发起罢工，要求涨薪。
8月1日，广东河源中光电通讯技术有限公司工人集体罢工，抗议公司搬迁不赔偿以及拖欠工资。据工人透露，中光电已经于今年4月搬迁至江西，老板为了逃避赔偿，给不愿搬迁的人留了一条产线，欠薪是为了逼迫他们自动离职。
8月6日至7日，国药乐仁堂医药有限公司的数十名被辞退员工集体维权，要求赔偿。工人表示，尽管公司在6月1日曾书面承诺解决补偿问题，但一个月后却出尔反尔，不仅拒绝赔偿，甚至要求已工作多年的老员工自证工龄，态度极其恶劣。
8月7日和9日，广东清远溢绩制衣有限公司的百余名工人罢工，抗议公司单方面将工资降低40%。工人表示，这次大幅降薪严重影响了工人们的生活，导致他们无法继续维持生计。
8月8日至11日，广州凯艺纸品包装有限公司的约200名工人连续多日维权，追讨被拖欠数月的工资。这家年产值过亿的中型包装企业，在8月8日突然宣布倒闭，公司老板不知所踪。据了解，凯艺公司长期以极低的利润运营，而即将于9月执行的社保新规，每月将为其带来近50万元的社保成本，远超其每月15万至24万元的利润，最终导致工厂资金链断裂。
8月8日，上海国利汽车真皮饰件有限公司的数百名工人再次聚集维权，抗议公司裁员补偿标准过低。根据工人提供的资料，公司的赔偿方案是“工龄一年2740元”，这意味着一名工作十年的员工只能获得2.74万元的赔偿，工人们称其为“全上海最低的赔偿”。早在去年11月，该公司就曾因拖欠工资和变相裁员引发工人抗议，并导致多人被捕。
8月11日至13日，广东深圳光明区雷松科技有限公司的员工连续三天罢工，要求公司对搬迁厂区至惠州给出明确的补偿方案。工人们表示，公司一直在悄悄转移设备，但始终没有就赔偿问题给出任何承诺。
8月11日至14日，广东深圳先进半导体设备有限公司宣布解散后，近千名员工通过连续四天的集体维权行动，为自己争取到了“N+3+3000元”的赔偿。
8月11日，重庆北大医药的待岗员工集体维权，抗议公司要求已经待岗长达七年的老员工进行转岗培训。工人们认为，公司这一举动是变相逼迫已有数十年工龄的工人自动离职，而公司方面也始终没有给出明确的工作岗位、性质、地点和工资待遇等信息。
8月12日，由于数月未领到工资，河北廊坊固安县航天振邦精密机械有限公司上千工人罢工。廊坊航天振邦成立于 2010 年，由北京航天振邦精密机械有限公司作为主投资方控股新建，有员工1500人，产品广泛应用于神舟载人飞船、“北斗”卫星系统等重大航天项目。
8月14至15日，广东深圳华润饮料有限公司工人连日罢工，抗议公司搬迁厂区不赔偿。华润饮料是是央企华润集团旗下的饮料生产企业，以1990年推出的“怡宝”牌纯净水最为知名。
8月20至21日，广西桂林苏桥比亚迪工人罢工，要求比亚迪执行桂林市的最低工资标准2200元，因为比亚迪所在的苏桥经开区属于桂林城区，但比亚迪坚持要按永福县的标准1870元执行。最终，由于当地政府介入，罢工失败。
8月21日，广东东莞茂瑞电子厂的2000名工人集体罢工，抗议公司搬迁厂区不赔偿。据工人透露，茂瑞电子近期将工厂从东莞牛山搬至东莞清溪，但拒绝向工人支付补偿，并采取“蚂蚁搬家”的方式转移工厂设备。
8月23至25日，广东广州增城新塘镇亦高制衣厂倒闭，工人连续三天维权，讨要工资。
8月27日，江苏灌云县明昊电子厂伊芦分厂在已经放假两个月的情况下，再次通知停工两个月，且期间不发放任何补助。据工人透露，明昊电子厂共有三个分厂，其中两个分厂的工人由老板缴纳了社保，而伊芦分厂因地处农村、工人年龄偏大且月薪仅千余元，一直未给工人缴纳社保。近日，在劳动局要求为工人购买社保后，老板以继续放假为由，企图规避社保责任和赔偿义务，逼迫工人自行离职。工人曾要求老板每月发放数百元补助，但遭拒绝。随后，工人前往县政府维权，却未获任何回应。
8月28至29日，广东珠海奇思智能制造有限公司工人连续两天维权，抗议公司宣布放假三个月，以逃避将工厂搬迁到东莞后的赔偿义务。
8月27至9月1日，山东鼎梁消防科技有限公司倒闭后，700名工人连续六天驻守厂区并封堵大门，讨要被拖欠了4个月的工资。
8月30日至9月1日，湖南涟源佳利制衣有限公司倒闭，工人连续三天维权，要求赔偿。
9月1日，江西新德工业织造有限公司数百工人集体罢工，讨要被拖欠了4个月的工资。
9月2日，湖南衡山县新金龙纸厂拖欠工人工资超过半年，工人维权讨要工资。据工人透露，新金龙纸厂已经倒闭，
9月2日，广东东莞安道迩科技有限公司倒闭，工人集体维权，讨要工资。
9月2日，广东佛山，港资盈特金属制品有限公司面临倒闭，数百工人发起罢工，要求赔偿。
这22起罢工与维权行动，既是分散的个体事件，也是同一困境下的集体回响。对工人而言，罢工并非激进的对抗手段，而是被逼无奈的最后选择。在一次次集体行动中，工人们展现出更强的凝聚力与维权意识。可以预见，在未来一段时间内，这股工人自发维权的浪潮仍将持续。
“22 Strikes in 33 Days: Manufacturing Workers’ Strikes Under the Double Pressure of Economic Downturn and ‘Mandatory Social Insurance’”
Over the past month, China’s manufacturing industry has witnessed a wave of consecutive workers’ strikes. On factory floors, assembly lines, and in industrial parks, scenes of collective walkouts and labor protests have repeatedly unfolded.
Behind this strike wave lie two major pressures: plummeting orders caused by the economic downturn, and surging operating costs driven by the rollout of the “mandatory social insurance” policy, which has placed enormous burdens on small- and medium-sized enterprises. These pressures have already pushed many companies into bankruptcy. Of the 22 labor disputes we tracked, nine factories have already declared bankruptcy, while the rest are under immense financial strain. Yet the consequences are not borne by businesses alone. For ordinary workers, the costs are shifted down onto them, resulting in wage cuts, unpaid wages, uncompensated layoffs, and uncompensated relocations.
According to Yesterday Channel’s statistics, from August 1 to September 2, 2025 — just 33 days — there were 22 collective labor actions across China’s manufacturing sector. These cases spanned pharmaceuticals, textiles, aerospace, packaging, auto parts, and semiconductors. They not only highlight the intensifying conflicts between labor and management but also reveal the precarious situation manufacturing workers now face.
The 22 incidents are as follows:
- Aug 1 – Workers at Fengyuan Shoe Factory, Daoxian County, Yongzhou, Hunan, went on strike demanding higher wages, as their monthly pay was only RMB 1,500.
- Aug 1 – Workers at Zhongguangdian Communications Technology Co., Ltd., Heyuan, Guangdong, struck to protest relocation without compensation and unpaid wages. The factory had already moved to Jiangxi in April, and management withheld wages to force unwilling workers to quit.
- Aug 6–7 – Dozens of laid-off employees at Guoyao Lerentang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. protested for severance. Although the company promised in writing on June 1 to resolve compensation, a month later it reneged and even forced long-serving employees to “prove their work years.”
- Aug 7 & 9 – Over 100 workers at Yiji Garment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Qingyuan, Guangdong, went on strike after the company unilaterally slashed wages by 40%. Workers said the cut made survival impossible.
- Aug 8–11 – Around 200 workers at Guangzhou Kaiyi Paper Packaging Co., Ltd. protested for several days to demand unpaid wages. On Aug 8, the company suddenly declared bankruptcy and the owner disappeared. With profits of only RMB 150,000–240,000 per month, the firm could not withstand the extra RMB 500,000 monthly cost of the upcoming September social insurance requirements, leading to a cash flow collapse.
- Aug 8 – Hundreds of workers at Shanghai Guoli Automotive Leather Interiors Co., Ltd. protested again, demanding fairer severance pay. The proposed compensation was “RMB 2,740 per year of service,” which workers called “the lowest in Shanghai.” The company had already faced protests last November for unpaid wages and disguised layoffs, during which several workers were arrested.
- Aug 11–13 – Employees at Leisong Technology Co., Ltd., Guangming District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, went on a three-day strike demanding compensation for relocation to Huizhou. Workers said equipment was being moved secretly, but no commitment on compensation was given.
- Aug 11–14 – After Shenzhen Advanced Semiconductor Equipment Co., Ltd. dissolved, nearly 1,000 employees held four days of protests, eventually winning “N + 3 + RMB 3,000” compensation.
- Aug 11 – Idle employees of Chongqing Beida Pharmaceutical protested the company’s demand that workers idled for seven years undergo retraining. Workers believed this was a ploy to force them to quit, and the company never clarified job positions, nature, location, or pay.
- Aug 12 – Over 1,000 workers at Aerospace Zhenbang Precision Machinery Co., Ltd., Gu’an County, Langfang, Hebei, went on strike over months of unpaid wages. Founded in 2010, the company employs 1,500 workers and supplies major projects such as Shenzhou manned spacecraft and the BeiDou satellite system.
- Aug 14–15 – Workers at Shenzhen Huaren Beverage Co., Ltd., Guangdong (a subsidiary of state-owned China Resources, best known for its “C’estbon” bottled water brand), went on strike to protest relocation without compensation.
- Aug 20–21 – BYD workers at Suqiao, Guilin, Guangxi, went on strike demanding enforcement of Guilin City’s minimum wage of RMB 2,200. BYD insisted on applying the RMB 1,870 standard for Yongfu County. With government intervention, the strike failed.
- Aug 21 – 2,000 workers at Maorui Electronics Factory, Dongguan, Guangdong, went on strike over uncompensated relocation. Workers said the company was moving operations from Niushan to Qingxi, but refused compensation while secretly relocating equipment.
- Aug 23–25 – After Yigao Garment Factory, Xintang Town, Zengcheng District, Guangzhou, collapsed, workers protested for three days demanding owed wages.
- Aug 27 – At Minghao Electronics’ Yilu branch, Guanyun County, Jiangsu, workers were told of another two-month suspension after already being off work for two months, with no allowance. Unlike its other two branches, Yilu workers had no social insurance. After the labor bureau required coverage, the employer extended suspension to avoid costs and compensation. Workers’ appeals to the county government went unanswered.
- Aug 28–29 – Workers at Qisi Intelligent Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, Guangdong, protested the company’s three-month “vacation,” meant to avoid relocation compensation after moving operations to Dongguan.
- Aug 27–Sep 1 – After Dingliang Fire Technology Co., Ltd., Shandong, collapsed, 700 workers guarded the factory gates for six days demanding four months of unpaid wages.
- Aug 30–Sep 1 – After Jiali Garment Co., Ltd., Lianyuan, Hunan, collapsed, workers protested for three days demanding compensation.
- Sep 1 – Hundreds of workers at Xinde Industrial Weaving Co., Ltd., Jiangxi, struck over four months of unpaid wages.
- Sep 2 – Workers at Xinjinglong Paper Mill, Hengshan County, Hunan, protested six months of unpaid wages. The plant has already gone bankrupt.
- Sep 2 – After Andaoer Technology Co., Ltd., Dongguan, Guangdong, collapsed, workers protested for owed wages.
- Sep 2 – Hundreds of workers at Hong Kong-funded Yinte Metal Products Co., Ltd., Foshan, Guangdong, went on strike over pending factory closure and demanded compensation.
These 22 strikes and protests are both isolated incidents and collective echoes of a shared predicament. For workers, strikes are not radical acts of confrontation, but the last resort when all options are exhausted. Through these repeated collective actions, workers have demonstrated stronger solidarity and awareness of their rights. It is foreseeable that this wave of grassroots labor actions will continue in the coming period.