「广东东莞丹缇轩业主维权遭镇压多人被抓走（2025.10.25）」10月25日，广东东莞塘厦镇丹缇轩小区的业主在维权时遭警察镇压，多人被抓走。半年前，丹缇轩小区业主因塘厦镇林村村委强占小区广场用于道路扩建而发起维权行动，持续至今。25日，为强行施工，当地政府出动大量警察，将业主停放在广场上的车辆全部拖走，业主到现场抗议时，与警察发生了冲突。

“Dongguan Danti Xuan Residents Crackdown: Multiple Arrested During Protest (Oct 25, 2025)”
On October 25, residents of Danti Xuan community in Tangxia Town, Dongguan, Guangdong, were suppressed by police during a protest, with multiple people arrested.

Six months ago, the residents launched the protest after the Lin Village Committee of Tangxia Town forcibly occupied the community’s plaza for road expansion, and the action has continued since.

On the 25th, to push through construction, local authorities deployed a large number of police and towed all vehicles parked in the plaza. When residents went to protest, they clashed with the police.

「赔偿标准仅0.3N，数百超市员工连日抗议（2025.10.20-22）」数百名来自中国各地的人人乐超市员工，10月20日至22日连续三天聚集在位于陕西西安的人人乐总部，抗议公司长期拖欠工资与社保，要求合理赔偿。

据员工透露，人人乐的控股方曲江文投为“保壳”而进行资本腾挪，将人人乐名下 13家子公司以每家1元的价格转卖给空壳公司，转移债务后仅保障高管薪资，而普通员工却被长期拖欠工资、欠缴社保，并拒绝为离职员工提供补偿。过去一年，深圳、南宁、天津等多地的人人乐员工曾发起过多次维权行动，讨要工资及社保。

抗议现场，员工在现场高喊口号：“我们要吃饭！我们要赔偿！” 据现场员工透露，由于人人乐坚持只按远低于法定标准的“0.3N”方案赔偿员工，此次维权行动未取得任何进展。

公开资料显示，人人乐连锁商业集团股份有限公司（简称“人人乐”）成立于1996年，总部最初位于深圳，是中国最早的大型连锁超市品牌之一。2010年在深圳证券交易所上市，后因连年亏损，于2025年正式退市。
近年来，人人乐在全国范围内关闭大量门店，涉及员工数千人。控股方西安曲江文化产业投资（集团）有限公司为国企，2021年入主后曾宣称将“重组人人乐、保就业”，但随着人人乐持续亏损，员工维权事件频发。

“Compensation Set at Only 0.3N: Hundreds of Supermarket Employees Protest for Days (Oct 20–22, 2025)”

Hundreds of employees from Renrenle Supermarket branches across China gathered for three consecutive days, from October 20 to 22, outside the company’s headquarters in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province. They protested against long-term wage arrears and unpaid social insurance contributions, demanding fair compensation.

According to employees, Renrenle’s controlling shareholder, Qujiang Cultural Investment Group (Qujiang Wintop), in an effort to “maintain its listing status,” conducted a capital restructuring by transferring 13 Renrenle subsidiaries to shell companies for just 1 yuan each. After shifting the debts, the company continued to pay executive salaries while ordinary employees went unpaid, lacked social insurance coverage, and were denied severance compensation upon resignation. Over the past year, Renrenle employees in cities such as Shenzhen, Nanning, and Tianjin have repeatedly staged protests to demand unpaid wages and insurance.

At the protest site, employees chanted slogans such as “We need to eat!” and “We want compensation!” According to those present, the company insisted on compensating workers based on a “0.3N” formula—far below China’s legal standard—resulting in no progress in the negotiations.

Public records show that Renrenle Chain Commercial Group Co., Ltd. (Renrenle) was founded in 1996 and was one of China’s earliest large-scale supermarket chains. Initially headquartered in Shenzhen, it was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010 but was delisted in 2025 after years of financial losses.

In recent years, Renrenle has closed a large number of stores nationwide, affecting thousands of employees. Its controlling shareholder, Xi’an Qujiang Cultural Industry Investment (Group) Co., Ltd.—a state-owned enterprise—took over in 2021, pledging to “restructure Renrenle and preserve jobs.” However, as losses continued to mount, labor protests have become increasingly frequent.

「四川凉山彝族学生罢课抗议周末补课（2025.10.17）」10月17日，四川凉山州喜德县民族中学初二学生集体罢课，聚集在教学楼前高喊口号，抗议学校周末补课。据学生透露，长假过后，学校已经连续上课八天，但学校领导仍然要求初二学生周末补课，引发学生不满。迫于学生压力，学校当天取消了周末补课计划。

“Yi Students in Sichuan’s Liangshan Protest Weekend Classes (Oct. 17, 2025)”

On October 17, students in Grade 8 at Xide County Ethnic Middle School in Liangshan Prefecture, Sichuan, went on strike and gathered in front of the school building, chanting slogans to protest against weekend make-up classes. According to students, the school had already held eight consecutive days of classes following the long holiday, yet administrators still demanded that Grade 8 students attend additional weekend lessons. Facing mounting student pressure, the school eventually canceled the planned weekend classes that same day.

「大连女孩徐园离奇身亡案再次开庭，数百网民庭外声援（2025.10.24）」10月24日下午，备受争议的“徐园案”在辽宁大连普兰店区人民法院再次开庭。数百名从中国各地赶到现场的网友聚集在法院外，声援受害者一家。当局出动大批警察和特警在现场戒备，庭外气氛紧张，人群高喊“杀人偿命”等口号。期间，网友与维稳警察一度发生冲突，至少一名网友被抓走。在法庭内，法官再次宣布徐园前男友、嫌疑人单某无罪。徐园的姐姐表示，本次庭审仅持续约两分钟，法官便直接宣布了判决结果。

案件的起点可追溯至2022年4月26日凌晨。23岁的徐园被发现死于男友单某家中，胸口插着一把水果刀，肋骨骨折，全身几十处伤。法医鉴定她死于“锐器刺切胸部致心脏、肺脏破裂”。然而，法院最终将案件定性为“自杀”，嫌疑人单某无罪释放。这一结论自公布以来便引起家属和公众的强烈质疑。

据悉，2022年2月12日，徐园经人介绍认识单某，两人不久确立恋爱关系，并在两个月后同居。一审判决认定，2022年4月25日晚，单某、徐园和几位朋友先后在当地的烧烤店和歌厅吃饭喝酒。次日凌晨，单某和徐园回到家中后发生争执，从屋内延续到楼外，单某对徐园进行了言语侮辱和殴打。随后，两人再次返回家中，徐园出事。

据单某供述，当晚，徐园先去洗澡，因徐园不同意他提出煮方便面的要求，两人发生言语冲突，单某摔门而出，徐园围了一条浴巾追了出去。两人在离家十余米的楼前发生了撕扯，单某用手打了徐园几下，后将其整个人拽倒在地。随后，单某劝说徐园先回两人的住所，两人一前一后回到了家。单某称，徐园进门后，找了一件白色衣服穿上，走到厨房水池边拿起一把水果刀，拔下刀鞘，转身说了一句“我徐园怎么对不起你了”，紧接着突然撩起衣服，将刀插进了自己的左胸口。但事发当晚，仅有单某和徐园两个人，无第三人证实究竟发生了什么。

经大连市普兰店区公安司法鉴定中心鉴定，徐园系锐器刺切胸部致左侧肺脏、心脏破裂大出血死亡，但上衣并无破口；徐园双眼、鼻部、左耳等及下唇粘膜破损出血等符合钝性外力作用形成，徒手击打可形成；额部、左上臂、双下肢等符合受外力作用形成，双手掌侧血迹分布呈空心状，右手指关节有划伤。这份报告中存在两个引发争议的细节：一，衣服无破口： 徐园胸口的致命刀伤深达心脏，但她所穿的上衣却没有破口。二，身体多处外伤： 尸检还显示，徐园的头部、面部、四肢均有不同程度的外伤，与“争执后被殴打”的情节吻合。

这两点让家属坚信徐园不是自杀，而是他杀。据悉，单某曾有斗殴、故意伤害等暴力前科。2014年，单某因为故意伤害罪被判一年，缓刑两年，在缓刑期间，单某又因为犯聚众斗殴罪被撤销缓刑，判四年零两个月刑期。2021年，单某再次因为殴打他人被刑拘十五日，罚款五百元。

案发前几天，两人争吵频繁。4月20日晚，徐园在单某父母经营的殡葬店找到醉酒的单某，被对方殴打。单父在证词中也提到，当晚徐园曾打电话称自己被打，后来他赶到现场调解，二人又和好。4月23日晚9点左右，二人再次发生争吵，单某对徐园说“你去死吧”。

尽管存在多处疑点，2023年9月，普兰店区法院一审判决认为徐园系因情绪激动自行持刀刺胸自杀，单某虽有轻微殴打行为，但证据不足以证明与死亡存在直接因果关系，遂判无罪释放。之后，检方提起抗诉，但历经数次庭审，法院仍维持原判。

近三年来，徐园的家人从未接受“自杀”这一结论，坚持认为：徐园并无明显自杀倾向；衣服无破口、刀具血迹异常、现场勘查疏漏、调查过程缺乏透明性等一系列问题均指向他杀。徐母在采访中坚定表示：“我女儿绝不会自己拿刀刺心脏，她才23岁，有工作、有朋友、有计划。”

10月24日的庭审结束后，许多专程赶到现场声援的网友对庭审的结果表示极度失望和愤怒，认为法庭判决结果是对公平正义、以及受害者家属的严重伤害。徐园的家属则表示将继续抗争，永不放弃。

“Case of Dalian Girl Xu Yuan’s Mysterious Death Reopens; Hundreds Gather Outside Court in Support (Oct 24, 2025)”

On the afternoon of October 24, the highly controversial “Xu Yuan case” was once again heard at the People’s Court of Pulandian District, Dalian, Liaoning Province. Hundreds of netizens from across China gathered outside the courthouse to support the victim’s family. A large number of police officers and SWAT forces were deployed to maintain order, and the atmosphere outside the court was tense. The crowd chanted slogans such as “A murderer must pay with his life.” During the confrontation, clashes broke out between supporters and police, and at least one person was detained. Inside the courtroom, the judge once again declared Xu Yuan’s ex-boyfriend, the suspect Shan Mou, not guilty. Xu Yuan’s sister said the hearing lasted only about two minutes before the judge directly announced the verdict.

The case dates back to the early morning of April 26, 2022. Xu Yuan, a 23-year-old woman, was found dead in the home of her boyfriend, Shan Mou, with a fruit knife lodged in her chest, fractured ribs, and dozens of bruises across her body. A forensic autopsy determined that she died from “stab and cut injuries to the chest causing rupture of the heart and lungs.” However, the court later ruled her death a suicide, and Shan was acquitted—an outcome that immediately triggered outrage and disbelief among Xu’s family and the public.

According to records, Xu Yuan met Shan through an introduction on February 12, 2022. They soon began dating and moved in together two months later. The first trial found that on the night of April 25, Shan, Xu, and several friends had dinner and drinks at a local barbecue restaurant and karaoke bar. In the early hours of the next day, after returning home, the couple argued—first inside, then outside the building—during which Shan verbally insulted and assaulted Xu. They then went back home, where the fatal incident occurred.

Shan claimed that Xu went to shower, and when she refused his request to cook instant noodles, an argument broke out. He slammed the door and left the apartment, with Xu following him outside wearing only a towel. They scuffled about ten meters from the building entrance; Shan admitted to hitting Xu several times and pulling her to the ground. Later, he persuaded her to return home, and the two went back together. Shan said Xu put on a white shirt, walked to the kitchen sink, picked up a fruit knife, removed its sheath, said “What have I, Xu Yuan, ever done to you?” and suddenly lifted her shirt and stabbed herself in the chest. No third person was present that night to verify what really happened.

A forensic report from the Pulandian District Public Security Bureau determined that Xu died from massive bleeding due to stab wounds that pierced her left lung and heart. However, her clothing showed no tear marks. The report also noted blunt-force injuries to her eyes, nose, left ear, and lips consistent with assault, and additional bruises on her forehead, arms, and legs. Bloodstains on her palms were hollow-patterned, and her right fingers were cut. Two details have been particularly controversial:

1. No tear in clothing – despite a fatal knife wound penetrating her heart.
2. Multiple external injuries –
   These findings led her family to firmly believe that Xu Yuan was murdered, not suicidal.

Records show that Shan had a history of violent offenses. In 2014, he was convicted of intentional injury and sentenced to one year in prison with a two-year suspension. During probation, he was convicted again for group assault and sentenced to four years and two months. In 2021, he was detained for 15 days and fined 500 yuan for assaulting another person.

In the days leading up to Xu’s death, the couple frequently quarreled. On April 20, Xu reportedly went to Shan’s family’s funeral shop to find him drunk and was beaten by him. Shan’s father testified that Xu called saying she had been hit; he went to mediate, and the two later reconciled. On the night of April 23, Shan told Xu, “Go die.”

Despite numerous inconsistencies, in September 2023 the Pulandian District Court ruled that Xu Yuan had stabbed herself in the chest during an emotional outburst. Although Shan admitted to minor assault, the court held there was insufficient evidence to link his actions directly to her death, and he was acquitted. Prosecutors appealed, but after multiple hearings, the court upheld the original verdict.

For nearly three years, Xu Yuan’s family has refused to accept the “suicide” conclusion. They insist that Xu had no suicidal tendencies and point to multiple irregularities—such as the intact clothing, questionable blood patterns, omissions in the crime scene investigation, and lack of transparency in the judicial process—as evidence of foul play. Xu’s mother said firmly in an interview: “My daughter would never stab herself in the heart. She was only 23, she had a job, friends, and plans for her future.”

After the October 24 hearing, many supporters who had traveled long distances expressed deep anger and disappointment at the verdict, calling it a betrayal of justice and the victim’s family. Xu Yuan’s relatives vowed to continue their fight for justice and “never give up.”

「贵阳摊贩：每日营收不足80，摊位费100（2025.10.22）」10月22日晚，贵州贵阳白云区，摊贩与城管在街头发生对峙。摊贩们表示，每个摊位每天的营业额甚至不足80元，而摊位费却高达100至200元。如果按照政府要求缴纳这笔费用“合法”经营，将入不敷出；但要是不交费，又会立刻被城管以“占道经营”的名义驱赶，甚至面临餐车被没收的风险。对峙中，一名摊贩情绪激动地表示，自己有四个小孩两个老人要养，还有20多万的贷款要还，”如果你们要逼着我去抢，你们给我出张证明“。

“Guiyang Vendors: Daily Revenue Under 80 Yuan, Stall Fee 100 (2025.10.22)”

On the evening of October 22, in Baiyun District, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, street vendors confronted urban management officers (chengguan) on the street. The vendors said each stall’s daily revenue is often less than 80 yuan, while stall fees run as high as 100 to 200 yuan. If they pay the fees required by the government to operate “legally,” they would operate at a loss; but if they don’t pay, they are immediately driven off by the chengguan for “occupying public space” and even risk having their food carts confiscated.

During the standoff, one vendor, visibly emotional, said he has four children and two elderly dependents to support and more than 200,000 yuan in loans to repay, adding, “If you’re going to force me to steal, then give me a written certificate.”

「江西浙江三工厂相继跑路，工人连日维权讨薪（2025.10.20-22）」10月20日至22日，江西和浙江三家工厂的老板相继跑路，引发员工连日维权讨薪。

10月21日，江西乐平市锦宏印刷厂老板一家集体消失，欠下约200名工人四个月工资，总额达数百万元。工人连续两天在厂区及市政府门口维权，但至今未得到解决。据工人透露，锦宏印刷厂老板原本在温州开厂，2024年7月才搬迁至乐平。跑路前，他曾承诺在10月20日发放欠薪，并多次要求员工加班，但最终在发薪日携家人消失得无影无踪。

与此同时，浙江台州温岭市的婷琪鞋厂和嘉兴海宁市的霖浩服饰厂老板，也分别在10月20日和21日拖欠工资后跑路，导致员工连日维权讨薪。

“Three Factories in Jiangxi and Zhejiang Flee, Workers Protest for Unpaid Wages (Oct 20–22, 2025)”

From October 20 to 22, the owners of three factories in Jiangxi and Zhejiang fled, sparking days of worker protests for unpaid wages.

On October 21, the owner and his family of Jinhong Printing Factory in Leping, Jiangxi, disappeared, owing about 200 workers four months of wages—totaling several million yuan.

Workers protested for two straight days at the factory and in front of the city government, but the issue remains unresolved.

According to workers, the factory owner had originally run his business in Wenzhou and only relocated to Leping in July 2024.

Before fleeing, he had promised to pay the arrears on October 20 and repeatedly urged employees to work overtime—but on payday, he vanished with his entire family without a trace.

Meanwhile, the owners of Tingqi Shoe Factory in Wenling, Taizhou, and Linhao Garment Factory in Haining, Jiaxing, also fled on October 20 and 21 after failing to pay wages, leading to continuous protests by workers demanding their pay.

「广西浦北数百学生抗议学校禁用手机（2025.10.21）」10月21日晚，广西钦州浦北县第一职业学校，数百名学生因不满学校新近出台的“禁止学生使用手机”政策，相约在宿舍走廊上集体抗议。

多名学生表示，无论学校是否收回禁令，他们都不会上交手机。

据一名参与抗议的学生透露，由于学校在随后的22日派出多名教师进驻宿舍区“蹲守”，原计划于当晚继续进行的抗议活动被迫取消。

“Hundreds of Students in Pubei, Guangxi Protest School’s Ban on Mobile Phones (October 21, 2025)”

On the evening of October 21, at Pubei No. 1 Vocational School in Qinzhou, Guangxi, hundreds of students gathered in the dormitory corridors to protest the school’s newly implemented policy prohibiting students from using mobile phones.

Several students stated that they would not surrender their phones, regardless of whether the school revoked the ban.

According to a student who participated in the protest, the planned continuation of the protest that night was forced to be canceled because the school deployed multiple teachers to the dormitory area on the following day, October 22, to “monitor” the students.

2024年4月，因组建旨在推翻中共独裁政权的“中国民主胜利党”（下称“民胜党”），唐高峰、王威、周丹、王一飞、刘振刚、代露被四川省泸州市中级人民法院以“颠覆国家政权罪”判处有期徒刑，刑期从3年至12年不等。这是近年来中共镇压有组织反共的一起典型事件。

四川德阳鑫科木业有限公司退休工人唐高峰，在2008年在出国工作生活期间，接触并深入了解西方民主国家的政治制度后，萌生了在中国境内创立民主党派、推动中国走向真正民主宪政的想法。他为构想中的党派起名“中国民主胜利党”，并撰写了党纲、党章，设计了党徽。自2009年起，唐高峰在网络上广交朋友，并与志同道合、热忱且有较强行动力的王一飞、王威、刘振刚、周丹、代露等人共同筹建“民胜党”。

2011年10月初，在唐高峰出资支持下，“民胜党”第一届中央委员会在四川成都成华区召开。会议由唐高峰主持，通过了推翻中国共产党领导、改变社会主义制度等纲领性文件，确定了组织管理架构：唐高峰任主席，王威任副主席，其余成员分别担任组织部长、军事部长、农民部长等职务。

会后，“民胜党”成员开始赴境外谋求注册，发展组织成员，并宣传反共理念。期间，王威曾前往香港和台湾寻求政治和资金支持并办理政党注册，但未成功。王一飞、刘振刚、周丹则在唐高峰的资助下，通过“脸书”“推特”等境外社交平台和网站宣传“民胜党”成立信息和政治纲领，呼吁推翻中共独裁政权。

2011年至2015年，王一飞在博讯网建立“民胜党”专栏，先后发布《“民胜党”政治章程》《告全国人民书》及“民胜党第一届中央委员会”开幕词、闭幕词等多篇文章。2013年4月，王一飞曾在湖北省潜江市张贴反共标语，并拍照上传到“民胜党”网站。

2014年，代露通过周丹结识唐高峰并加入“民胜党”，在唐高峰的资助下积极物色和发展组织成员。

截至2015年底，唐高峰共为“民胜党”出资40.63万元。2016年起，唐高峰不再为“民胜党”提供资金，并停止了相关活动。

2022年5月至9月期间，四川泸州当局突然抓捕了十余名“民胜党”成员，制造了著名的“泸州2022大抓捕案”。2024年4月，泸州中级法院作出判决，判处唐高峰、王威、王一飞、周丹、刘振刚、代露六人12年至3年不等的有期徒刑。同年12月，四川省高级人民法院终审维持原判。

六勇士简历

唐高峰：男，化名“唐民富”“唐富民”男，1955年11月16日出生，四川省南充市人，初中文化，德阳鑫科木业公司退休职工，2022年5月18日被捕，2024年被以“颠覆国家政权罪”重判有期徒刑12年，剥夺政治权利4年，没收个人财产50万元；目前在四川省某监狱服刑。

王威：男，化名“李义”，1967年10月24日出生，黑龙江省哈尔滨市人，常住四川省成都市新都区。2022年5月17日被捕，2024年被以“颠覆国家政权罪”重判有期徒刑8年，剥夺政治权利3年，没收个人财10万元; 目前在四川省某监狱服刑。

王一飞：男，化名“李中台”“龙飞腾”“赵南”，网名“一飞上天”，1985年6月29日出生，湖南省河口县人，初中文化，常住江西省南昌市化名小李，网络秘密民运组织”兴华会“创建者。2019年，因在南昌、赣州等地多处建筑物上喷涂反共标语，被中共当局以“寻衅滋事罪”判处有期徒刑2年。2022年5月18日再次被捕，2024年被以“颠覆国家政权罪”重判有期徒刑7年6个月，剥夺政治权利3年，罚金8万元。目前在四川省某监狱服刑。

周丹：男，曾用名周璇，男，1978年11月18日出生，四川省岳池县人，高中文化。2022年8月25日被捕，2024年被以“颠覆国家政权罪”重判有期徒刑6年，剥夺政治权利3年，没收个人财5万元；目前在四川省某监狱服刑。

刘振刚：男，化名“南宫道人”“刘子德”，1987年9月9日出生，河南省汤阴县人，中专文化，常住江苏省苏州市吴江区，2022年5月19日被捕，，2024年被以“颠覆国家政权罪”重判有期徒刑5年6个月，剥夺政治权利2年，并处罚金4万元；目前在四川省川中监狱六监区服刑，邮编637100。

代露：男，1987年2月8日出生，重庆市江津区人，中专文化，2022年5月19日被捕，2024年被以“颠覆国家政权罪”判处有期徒刑3年，剥夺政治权利1年，没收个人财2万元。曾德阳监狱服刑，目前已刑满获释。

（以上信息收集整理自维权网、民生观察网）

“The Six Heroes of the ‘Minsheng Party’ Heavily Sentenced for Forming a Party Aimed at Overthrowing the CCP”

In April 2024, Tang Gaofeng, Wang Wei, Zhou Dan, Wang Yifei, Liu Zhengang, and Dai Lu were sentenced by the Luzhou Intermediate People’s Court in Sichuan Province to prison terms ranging from three to twelve years for “subverting state power,” due to their involvement in forming the China Democratic Victory Party (hereafter “Minsheng Party”), which aimed to overthrow the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictatorship. This case represents a typical example in recent years of the CCP’s crackdown on organized anti-communist activity.

Tang Gaofeng, a retired worker from Sichuan Deyang Xinke Wood Industry Co., developed the idea of establishing a democratic political party in China and promoting a genuine constitutional democracy after being exposed to the political systems of Western democracies while working abroad in 2008. He named the proposed party the China Democratic Victory Party, drafted its program and constitution, and designed its emblem. From 2009, Tang expanded his network online and, together with like-minded, committed, and action-oriented individuals—Wang Yifei, Wang Wei, Liu Zhengang, Zhou Dan, and Dai Lu—began to organize the Minsheng Party.

In early October 2011, with Tang Gaofeng’s financial support, the first Central Committee of the Minsheng Party convened in Chenghua District, Chengdu, Sichuan. Chaired by Tang, the meeting approved programmatic documents calling for the overthrow of CCP leadership and the transformation of the socialist system, and established the organizational structure: Tang Gaofeng as Chairman, Wang Wei as Vice Chairman, and the other members as Ministers of Organization, Military Affairs, and Agriculture.

Afterward, Minsheng Party members sought registration abroad, recruited members, and promoted anti-CCP ideas. During this period, Wang Wei traveled to Hong Kong and Taiwan to seek political and financial support and attempted party registration, but without success. Wang Yifei, Liu Zhengang, and Zhou Dan, funded by Tang, used foreign social media platforms and websites such as Facebook and Twitter to publicize the establishment of the Minsheng Party and its political program, calling for the overthrow of the CCP dictatorship.

From 2011 to 2015, Wang Yifei created a Minsheng Party column on Boxun.com, publishing multiple articles including the “Minsheng Party Political Charter,” the “Letter to the People of China,” and opening and closing remarks of the first Central Committee. In April 2013, Wang Yifei posted anti-CCP slogans in Qianjiang City, Hubei Province, and uploaded photos to the Minsheng Party website.

In 2014, Dai Lu joined the Minsheng Party through Zhou Dan and, with Tang’s support, actively recruited new members.

By the end of 2015, Tang Gaofeng had contributed a total of 406,300 RMB to the Minsheng Party. From 2016, Tang ceased funding and party-related activities.

Between May and September 2022, authorities in Luzhou, Sichuan, suddenly arrested more than ten Minsheng Party members, in what became known as the Luzhou 2022 Mass Arrest Case. In April 2024, the Luzhou Intermediate Court sentenced Tang Gaofeng, Wang Wei, Wang Yifei, Zhou Dan, Liu Zhengang, and Dai Lu to prison terms ranging from 3 to 12 years. In December of the same year, the Sichuan High Court upheld the original verdicts.

Profiles of the Six Heroes

• Tang Gaofeng: Male, aliases “Tang Minfu,” “Tang Fumin,” born November 16, 1955, Nanchong, Sichuan, junior high education, retired worker of Deyang Xinke Wood Industry Co. Arrested May 18, 2022; in 2024, sentenced to 12 years for “subverting state power,” deprived of political rights for 4 years, fined 500,000 RMB; currently imprisoned in Sichuan.
• Wang Wei: Male, alias “Li Yi,” born October 24, 1967, Harbin, Heilongjiang, resident of Xindu District, Chengdu, Sichuan. Arrested May 17, 2022; sentenced in 2024 to 8 years, deprived of political rights for 3 years, fined 100,000 RMB; currently imprisoned in Sichuan.
• Wang Yifei: Male, aliases “Li Zhongtai,” “Long Feiteng,” “Zhao Nan,” online name “Yifei Shangtian,” born June 29, 1985, Hekou County, Hunan, junior high education, resident of Nanchang, Jiangxi (alias Xiao Li), founder of the secret online pro-democracy group “Xinghua Society.” Previously sentenced to 2 years in 2019 for “provoking trouble” for posting anti-CCP slogans in Nanchang and Ganzhou. Arrested again May 18, 2022; sentenced in 2024 to 7 years 6 months, deprived of political rights for 3 years, fined 80,000 RMB; currently imprisoned in Sichuan.
• Zhou Dan: Male, formerly Zhou Xuan, born November 18, 1978, Yuechi County, Sichuan, high school education. Arrested August 25, 2022; sentenced in 2024 to 6 years, deprived of political rights for 3 years, fined 50,000 RMB; currently imprisoned in Sichuan.
• Liu Zhengang: Male, aliases “Nangong Daoren,” “Liu Zide,” born September 9, 1987, Tangyin County, Henan, technical school education, resident of Wujiang District, Suzhou, Jiangsu. Arrested May 19, 2022; sentenced in 2024 to 5 years 6 months, deprived of political rights for 2 years, fined 40,000 RMB; currently serving in Sichuan Chuan Zhong Prison, Block Six (postal code 637100).
• Dai Lu: Male, born February 8, 1987, Jiangjin District, Chongqing, technical school education. Arrested May 19, 2022; sentenced in 2024 to 3 years, deprived of political rights for 1 year, fined 20,000 RMB. Previously imprisoned in Deyang Prison, now released after serving sentence.

(Information compiled from Rights Defense Net and Minsheng Observation Net.)

「湖北被剥夺退休金老人维权与警冲突（2025.10.21）」10月21日，在湖北省人社厅门口维权的退休老人，与维稳警察发生冲突，一名老人倒地不起。据当事人透露，他们本是湖北省缴纳了养老金、已正常退休、并领取退休金多年的退休老人。然而，2019年3月，湖北省人社厅在未提前通知的情况下，以“曾有服刑历史”为由，单方面停发了他们的养老金。2020年5月，在众多受害者抗议之下，湖北省人社厅才出台了一份缺乏法律依据的文件，并根据该文件强制要求他们办理二次退休，要求他们将已领取的养老金退还给人社厅，否则将以“安葬费抵扣”、“子女承担”等方式强制执行。2025年，湖北省人社厅再次在未通知或告知受害者的情况下，篡改并克扣他们的实际工作年限，进行所谓的二次核算。过去六年里，这些被剥夺养老金的老人曾多次发起维权行动，并因此遭到武汉当局以跟踪、监控、限制出行等方式长期打压，至今仍未停止。

“Hubei Retirees Deprived of Pensions Clash with Police During Protest (October 21, 2025)”
On October 21, at the Hubei Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security, retired elders protesting for their pensions clashed with stability-maintaining police, leaving one elderly person collapsed on the ground. According to the participants, these individuals had legally paid into Hubei’s pension system, retired normally, and received their pensions for many years. However, in March 2019, the Hubei Department of Human Resources and Social Security unilaterally suspended their pensions without prior notice, citing alleged “criminal records.”

In May 2020, following protests by many affected retirees, the department issued a legally questionable document, and based on it, forcibly required them to undergo a “second retirement,” demanding the return of pensions they had already received. The department threatened enforcement through measures such as “deducting from burial expenses” or holding their children financially responsible.

In 2025, without notifying the victims, the department again altered and deducted from their actual years of service in a so-called “second calculation.” Over the past six years, these pension-deprived retirees have repeatedly protested for their rights, facing long-term suppression by Wuhan authorities through surveillance, travel restrictions, and other measures, yet their struggle has not ceased.

「吉林长春警察要求被拦截访民“别影响正常秩序”（2025.10.21）」10月21日，吉林长春龙嘉国际机场安检处，多名截访人员试图绑架一位准备外出的女士，警察到场后反而告诫该女士“别影响正常秩序”。

“Changchun, Jilin Police Tell Intercepted Petitioners ‘Don’t Disturb Public Order’ (October 21, 2025)”

On October 21, at the security checkpoint of Longjia International Airport in Changchun, Jilin, multiple petition interceptors attempted to abduct a woman who was preparing to travel. When the police arrived at the scene, they instead warned the woman, saying, “Don’t disturb public order.”